Dual stack configuration release note#66996
Dual stack configuration release note#66996kcarmichael08 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:enterprise-4.14from
Conversation
|
🤖 Updated build preview is available at: Build log: https://circleci.com/gh/ocpdocs-previewbot/openshift-docs/30717 |
|
/lgtm |
|
/label peer-review-in-progress |
|
Just for reference, I'm adding the link to the doc preview: https://66996--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-14-release-notes |
|
/label merge-review-needed |
Thank you @lahinson |
|
/remove-label merge-review-needed Removing this for a moment, as I'm still completing peer review :) |
| [id="ocp-4-14-dual-stack-configuration"] | ||
| ==== Dual stack configuration for multiple IP addresses | ||
|
|
||
| In previous releases of Whereabouts IPAM CNI, only one IP address could be assigned per network interface. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| In previous releases of Whereabouts IPAM CNI, only one IP address could be assigned per network interface. | |
| In previous releases of the Whereabouts IPAM CNI plugin, only one IP address could be assigned per network interface. |
Adding a little more context here for any readers who might not immediately know that Whereabouts is an IPAM CNI plugin.
|
|
||
| In previous releases of Whereabouts IPAM CNI, only one IP address could be assigned per network interface. | ||
|
|
||
| Now, Whereabouts IPAM CNI supports assignment of an arbitrary number of IP addresses in order to support dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 functionality. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| Now, Whereabouts IPAM CNI supports assignment of an arbitrary number of IP addresses in order to support dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 functionality. | |
| Now, Whereabouts supports the assignment of an arbitrary number of IP addresses to support dual-stack IPv4/IPv6 functionality. |
- Since the first sentence states what Whereabouts is, I think we can get away with referring to it as simply "Whereabouts" in the second sentence.
- IBM Style advises using "to" instead of "in order to" in most cases. See the Word Usage page and ctrl+F to find the entry for "in order to".
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Why not make it better? Thank you.
|
/remove-label peer-review-in-progress |
8d2b00e to
0e12c00
Compare
|
New changes are detected. LGTM label has been removed. |
0e12c00 to
d4e975d
Compare
Version(s):
Issue: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-4938
Link to docs preview: https://66996--docspreview.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/release_notes/ocp-4-14-release-notes
QE review:
Additional information: