OSDOCS#15350: Removing unsupported OSSO versions for 4.20

[bergerhoffer]

Version(s):
4.20

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/OSDOCS-15350

Link to docs preview:
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/index.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-configuring.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-release-notes.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-uninstalling.html

QE review:

• QE has approved this change.

Additional information:

[ocpdocs-previewbot]

🤖 Wed Sep 10 20:45:30 - Prow CI generated the docs preview:

https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/index.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-configuring.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-release-notes.html
https://98852--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/nodes/scheduling/secondary_scheduler/nodes-secondary-scheduler-uninstalling.html

[openshift-ci]

@bergerhoffer: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[bergerhoffer]

@ingvagabund @zhouying7780 Can you PTAL and make sure it's correct that I'm removing these unsupported OSSO versions for 4.20 - and then once 1.5.0 goes out after 4.20 GA, we'll have a supported version here.

[ingvagabund]

Yes. This looks right. Anything below 1.5 => /dev/null.
LGTM

[zhouying7780]

/lgtm

[bergerhoffer]

/label merge-review-needed

[lahinson]

@bergerhoffer LGTM. You might want to double-check the preview for the release notes file and the uninstalling file. In the preview, the attributes in the titles of those files aren't rendering. Not sure if that's an attribute issue or expected behavior in the preview.

[bergerhoffer]

@bergerhoffer LGTM. You might want to double-check the preview for the release notes file and the uninstalling file. In the preview, the attributes in the titles of those files aren't rendering. Not sure if that's an attribute issue or expected behavior in the preview.

You know what, I just saw that in another PR's preview. I wonder if someone accidentally removed something that is impacting the doc set...

[bergerhoffer]

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

[openshift-cherrypick-robot]

@bergerhoffer: new pull request created: #99500

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.