Skip to content

CNV-15425: Clean up NUMA conceptual docs#99144

Merged
abrennan89 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
abrennan89:cleanupNUMA
Sep 17, 2025
Merged

CNV-15425: Clean up NUMA conceptual docs#99144
abrennan89 merged 1 commit intoopenshift:mainfrom
abrennan89:cleanupNUMA

Conversation

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor

@abrennan89 abrennan89 commented Sep 16, 2025

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:
https://99144--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-numa-aware-scheduling.html#cnf-numa-aware-scheduling-about-numa_numa-aware

QE review:

  • QE approved

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Reviewed and approved by Kevin Q and Ronan H

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 16, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-15425 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:

QE review:
N/A - docs restructure and edit only

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@ocpdocs-previewbot
Copy link

ocpdocs-previewbot commented Sep 16, 2025

@abrennan89 abrennan89 force-pushed the cleanupNUMA branch 2 times, most recently from 0beac25 to d61319b Compare September 16, 2025 17:17
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-15425 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:

QE review:

  • QE approved

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 16, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-15425 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:
https://99144--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-numa-aware-scheduling.html#cnf-numa-aware-scheduling-about-numa_numa-aware

QE review:

  • QE approved

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 16, 2025

@abrennan89: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@shajmakh
Copy link

/lgtm
Thanks @abrennan89.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-15425 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:
https://99144--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-numa-aware-scheduling.html#cnf-numa-aware-scheduling-about-numa_numa-aware

QE review:

  • QE approved

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 added merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR and removed merge-review-needed Signifies that the merge review team needs to review this PR labels Sep 17, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 17, 2025

@abrennan89: This pull request references CNV-15425 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

Details

In response to this:

Version(s):
4.12+

Issue:
https://issues.redhat.com/browse/CNV-15425

Link to docs preview:
https://99144--ocpdocs-pr.netlify.app/openshift-enterprise/latest/scalability_and_performance/cnf-numa-aware-scheduling.html#cnf-numa-aware-scheduling-about-numa_numa-aware

QE review:

  • QE approved

Additional information:
This PR is to clean up the existing NUMA conceptual docs so that they can be included in the CNV 4.20 NUMA topology docs for introduction and context purposes. I have split some of these docs into their own module, but the content has not changed. I have also removed the [discrete] headings as required for future DITA migration.

Reviewed and approved by Kevin Q and Ronan H

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@abrennan89 abrennan89 merged commit 5a3fc72 into openshift:main Sep 17, 2025
2 checks passed
@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

@abrennan89
Copy link
Contributor Author

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99273

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.20

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99274

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.19

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99275

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.18

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99276

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.17

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99277

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.16

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99278

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.15

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99279

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.14

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99280

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.13

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@openshift-cherrypick-robot

@abrennan89: new pull request created: #99281

Details

In response to this:

/cherrypick enterprise-4.12

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants