-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.8k
Fixing some typos #99927
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fixing some typos #99927
Conversation
|
/retest |
|
🤖 Thu Oct 02 13:23:28 - Prow CI generated the docs preview: |
modules/persistent-storage-csi-azure-file-static-provisioning-procedure.adoc
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
@bergerhoffer: all tests passed! Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
|
/label merge-review-needed I can merge after the merge review, because I know this will require manual CPs. Please only worry about the changed content (typos) and not any other vale hits, etc. |
|
/lgtm |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.20 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.19 |
|
/cherrypick enterprise-4.18 |
|
@bergerhoffer: #99927 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.20": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@bergerhoffer: #99927 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.19": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
|
@bergerhoffer: #99927 failed to apply on top of branch "enterprise-4.18": In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jldohmann @ShaunaDiaz It looks like the Vale rule for discrete headings didn't fire for this file. Any thoughts on why it didn't catch this?
|
4.20 didn't CP cleanly, but it's due to a discrete heading that wasn't removed in main, but was in 4.20 and back. Will update to fix main in a future PR. |
| Namespace-scoped network policy:: Application developers and namespace tenants can use the `NetworkPolicy` API to define network policy rules for a specific namespace. Rules in the `NetworkPolicy` for a namespace take precedence over cluster-wide rules configured using the BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy API, or for a cluster-wide rule that that has been delegated or "passed" from the cluster-wide `AdminNetworkPolicy` API. | ||
| Namespace-scoped network policy:: Application developers and namespace tenants can use the `NetworkPolicy` API to define network policy rules for a specific namespace. Rules in the `NetworkPolicy` for a namespace take precedence over cluster-wide rules configured using the BaselineAdminNetworkPolicy API, or for a cluster-wide rule that has been delegated or "passed" from the cluster-wide `AdminNetworkPolicy` API. | ||
|
|
||
| [discrete] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@bergerhoffer do you mean here? it's not a part of the git diff, so the CI will not check against it
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jldohmann I do. Lines 11 and 22.
I thought it would check on the whole file. Does it really only check against lines you change?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
vale will run on the whole file, but the output gets filtered using git diff and this determines which alerts gets commented on PRs: if an alert is determined to be outside of the modified file changes, it is discarded
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
i'm uncertain if changing things so that all alerts are reflected in PR comments is possible, based on the GH API the prow script uses: there's a comment that says the GH API only accepts comments within the diff for the review comments endpoint
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah I'm not saying we need to change it. I just want to make sure I understand exactly what it's doing so that we can make sure everyone else is aware as well. For some reason, I thought I had made a change to a file elsewhere and it picked something up. I'll check back through my test PRs to see if I can find what I'm talking about. Thanks!
Version(s):
4.12+
Issue:
N/A
Link to docs preview:
Only putting the files that have formatting (like extra backticks), and not just double words or misspellings:
QE review:
N/A, just typos
Additional information: