Skip to content

Conversation

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Until kube-proxy switches to the external endpoints informer (1.7) we
need to use the same one for DNS, which means aggregator does as well.

Can be removed once we move to 1.7

[test] @deads2k close, but no cigar

@deads2k
Copy link
Contributor

deads2k commented Jun 16, 2017

Wait for #14676 first please

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jun 16, 2017 via email

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

[test]

1 similar comment
@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

smarterclayton commented Jun 17, 2017 via email

Until kube-proxy switches to the external endpoints informer (1.7) we
need to use the same one for DNS, which means aggregator does as well.

Can be removed once we move to 1.7
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

Evaluated for origin test up to f18c39c

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

continuous-integration/openshift-jenkins/test SUCCESS (https://ci.openshift.redhat.com/jenkins/job/test_pull_request_origin/2363/) (Base Commit: 640b50e) (PR Branch Commit: f18c39c)

@smarterclayton smarterclayton merged commit a2d9765 into openshift:master Jun 18, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants