DPTP-4733: Unify pod scaler admission configs

[liangxia]

$ find ../release -name pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/app.ci/pod-scaler/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/build-clusters/common_except_app.ci/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/build-clusters/vsphere02/pod-scaler-admission.yaml

$ diff ../release/clusters/build-clusters/common_except_app.ci/pod-scaler-admission.yaml ../release/clusters/app.ci/pod-scaler/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
62c62
<     keel.sh/pollSchedule: "@hourly"
---
>     keel.sh/pollSchedule: "@every 5m"
79a80,82
>       tolerations:
>       - key: manual-provision
>         operator: Exists
82d84
<         imagePullPolicy: Always
83a86
>         imagePullPolicy: Always
126,127d128
<           limits:
<             memory: "24Gi"
129c130
<             memory: "16Gi"
---
>             memory: "8Gi"
131,133d131
<       nodeSelector:
<         kubernetes.io/arch: amd64
<         kubernetes.io/os: linux

Verified the tolerations and nodeSelector changes does not harm.

$ oc --context app.ci get nodes --show-labels | grep manual | wc -l
0

$ oc --context app.ci get nodes --show-labels | grep 'arch=amd64' | grep 'os=linux' | wc -l
32

[openshift-ci-robot]

@liangxia: This pull request references DPTP-4733 which is a valid jira issue.

Details

In response to this:

$ find ../release -name pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/app.ci/pod-scaler/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/build-clusters/common_except_app.ci/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
../release/clusters/build-clusters/vsphere02/pod-scaler-admission.yaml

$ diff ../release/clusters/build-clusters/common_except_app.ci/pod-scaler-admission.yaml ../release/clusters/app.ci/pod-scaler/pod-scaler-admission.yaml
62c62
<     keel.sh/pollSchedule: "@hourly"
---
>     keel.sh/pollSchedule: "@every 5m"
79a80,82
>       tolerations:
>       - key: manual-provision
>         operator: Exists
82d84
<         imagePullPolicy: Always
83a86
>         imagePullPolicy: Always
126,127d128
<           limits:
<             memory: "24Gi"
129c130
<             memory: "16Gi"
---
>             memory: "8Gi"
131,133d131
<       nodeSelector:
<         kubernetes.io/arch: amd64
<         kubernetes.io/os: linux

Verified the tolerations and nodeSelector changes does not harm.

$ oc --context app.ci get nodes --show-labels | grep manual | wc -l
0

$ oc --context app.ci get nodes --show-labels | grep 'arch=amd64' | grep 'os=linux' | wc -l
32

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

[openshift-ci]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: liangxia

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• clusters/OWNERS [liangxia]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[openshift-ci-robot]

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@liangxia: no rehearsable tests are affected by this change

Note: If this PR includes changes to step registry files (ci-operator/step-registry/) and you expected jobs to be found, try rebasing your PR onto the base branch. This helps pj-rehearse accurately detect changes when the base branch has moved forward.

[liangxia]

/hold
no mean to merge it on Friday.

[openshift-ci]

@liangxia: all tests passed!

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.