Skip to content

bump CI images version that were out of sync#79697

Open
yahlifried wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
yahlifried:bump-metallb-operator-ci
Open

bump CI images version that were out of sync#79697
yahlifried wants to merge 1 commit into
openshift:mainfrom
yahlifried:bump-metallb-operator-ci

Conversation

@yahlifried
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@yahlifried yahlifried commented May 26, 2026

Bumped yamls for 4.21, 4.22, 4.18 and main. all other unsynced version follows main.

Summary by CodeRabbit

This PR updates OpenShift CI configuration for the metallb-operator repository to synchronize CI test and release version metadata with their target OpenShift branches. Practically, it ensures the operator-e2e job and release integration versions run against the correct OpenShift releases:

  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-main.yaml

    • operator-e2e test version set to "4.22".
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml

    • operator-e2e test version set to "4.22".
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.21.yaml

    • operator-e2e test version set to "4.21".
    • releases.integration.name set to "4.21" (release latest/integration field updated).
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18.yaml

    • operator-e2e test version set to "4.18".

All changes are limited to CI YAML metadata (version fields for operator-e2e and release integration) so the operator's CI pipeline will run against the intended OpenShift release versions.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

coderabbitai Bot commented May 26, 2026

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: de0d182f-7610-474a-89ee-96fe727fdfb3

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4dd0553 and 4699648.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-main.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.21.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18.yaml

Walkthrough

This PR updates OpenShift version references in metallb-operator CI test configurations across four files. Each file's test version field is bumped to match its corresponding release or main branch: main gets 4.22, release-4.18 gets 4.18, release-4.21 gets 4.21, and release-4.22 gets 4.22.

Changes

CI Test Configuration Version Updates

Layer / File(s) Summary
Main branch and release branch version updates
ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-main.yaml, ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18.yaml, ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.21.yaml, ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml
Test version fields in operator-e2e test definitions are updated: main 4.20→4.22, release-4.18 4.17→4.18, release-4.21 4.20→4.21, release-4.22 4.20→4.22.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Suggested labels

lgtm, approved, rehearsals-ack

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 11 | ❌ 1

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)

Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title is generic and lacks specificity about which component is affected, though it accurately describes the general nature of the change. Make the title more specific by including the affected component name, e.g. 'bump metallb-operator CI image versions that were out of sync'.
✅ Passed checks (11 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Stable And Deterministic Test Names ✅ Passed PR modifies only CI operator YAML config files (version updates), not Ginkgo test code or test titles. No It(), Describe(), Context(), or When() test definitions present.
Test Structure And Quality ✅ Passed PR modifies only YAML CI configuration files with version bumps, not Ginkgo test code. The custom check for test structure quality is not applicable to YAML configuration changes.
Microshift Test Compatibility ✅ Passed No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added in this PR. The changes only update CI operator configuration version numbers for existing tests, not test code itself.
Single Node Openshift (Sno) Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates OpenShift version strings in CI config YAML files. No new Ginkgo e2e tests are added, so SNO compatibility check does not apply.
Topology-Aware Scheduling Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only updates CI operator configuration version references for metallb-operator, not deployment manifests or operator code. No scheduling constraints are introduced.
Ote Binary Stdout Contract ✅ Passed PR modifies only YAML CI configuration files with no source code changes, making the OTE Binary Stdout Contract check (which flags process-level code stdout writes) inapplicable.
Ipv6 And Disconnected Network Test Compatibility ✅ Passed PR only modifies CI operator configuration YAML files to update version strings (4.20→4.22, 4.17→4.18, etc). No new Ginkgo e2e test code is added, so IPv6/disconnected network check is not applicable.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci Bot requested review from fedepaol and oribon May 26, 2026 09:59
@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 26, 2026

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: yahlifried
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign dougbtv for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai Bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

Inline comments:
In
`@ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml`:
- Line 71: The downstream ProwJob artifacts weren’t regenerated after changing
ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml;
run make update in the repo root to regenerate
ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/, verify changes with git diff
--name-only origin/main -- ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/, and
commit the updated job YAMLs so the job artifacts reflect the version bump.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

  • Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
  • Create a new PR with the fixes

ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Repository YAML (base), Central YAML (inherited)

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Enterprise

Run ID: 5c3e2e2f-ebf0-442c-bb37-ecfb756cfadb

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9ddde9d and 4dd0553.

📒 Files selected for processing (4)
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-main.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.21.yaml
  • ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml

product: ocp
timeout: 1h0m0s
version: "4.20"
version: "4.22"
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if ProwJob artifacts were regenerated after config changes

echo "=== Checking for corresponding ProwJob updates ==="

# Check if job files exist and were modified for metallb-operator
fd -t f 'openshift-metallb-operator.*\.yaml' ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/ --exec echo "Found: {}"

echo ""
echo "=== Checking git diff for ci-operator/jobs changes ==="
git diff --name-only origin/main -- ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/

echo ""
echo "If no job files are shown above, make update may not have been run."

Repository: openshift/release

Length of output: 4191


Regenerate downstream ProwJob artifacts via make update
After the CI config change in ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml, git diff --name-only origin/main -- ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/ shows no updated job YAMLs, indicating make update didn’t regenerate downstream artifacts. Run make update and commit the resulting ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/ changes.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.

In
`@ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml`
at line 71, The downstream ProwJob artifacts weren’t regenerated after changing
ci-operator/config/openshift/metallb-operator/openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22.yaml;
run make update in the repo root to regenerate
ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/, verify changes with git diff
--name-only origin/main -- ci-operator/jobs/openshift/metallb-operator/, and
commit the updated job YAMLs so the job artifacts reflect the version bump.

@karampok
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

this repo is larget repo, it worth making the commit/PR title specific to which component (metallb-operator)

bump CI images version that were out of sync
a bit too generic

Bumped yamls for 4.21, 4.22, 4.18 and main. all other unsynced version follows main.

Signed-off-by: yahlifried <yfriedla@redhat.com>
@yahlifried yahlifried force-pushed the bump-metallb-operator-ci branch from 4dd0553 to 4699648 Compare May 26, 2026 10:15
@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[REHEARSALNOTIFIER]
@yahlifried: the pj-rehearse plugin accommodates running rehearsal tests for the changes in this PR. Expand 'Interacting with pj-rehearse' for usage details. The following rehearsable tests have been affected by this change:

Test name Repo Type Reason
pull-ci-openshift-metallb-operator-main-operator-e2e openshift/metallb-operator presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.18-operator-e2e openshift/metallb-operator presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.22-operator-e2e openshift/metallb-operator presubmit Ci-operator config changed
pull-ci-openshift-metallb-operator-release-4.21-operator-e2e openshift/metallb-operator presubmit Ci-operator config changed
Interacting with pj-rehearse

Comment: /pj-rehearse to run up to 5 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse skip to opt-out of rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse {test-name}, with each test separated by a space, to run one or more specific rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse more to run up to 10 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse max to run up to 25 rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse auto-ack to run up to 5 rehearsals, and add the rehearsals-ack label on success
Comment: /pj-rehearse list to get an up-to-date list of affected jobs
Comment: /pj-rehearse abort to abort all active rehearsals
Comment: /pj-rehearse network-access-allowed to allow rehearsals of tests that have the restrict_network_access field set to false. This must be executed by an openshift org member who is not the PR author

Once you are satisfied with the results of the rehearsals, comment: /pj-rehearse ack to unblock merge. When the rehearsals-ack label is present on your PR, merge will no longer be blocked by rehearsals.
If you would like the rehearsals-ack label removed, comment: /pj-rehearse reject to re-block merging.

@yahlifried
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Author

/pj-rehearse

@openshift-merge-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@yahlifried: now processing your pj-rehearse request. Please allow up to 10 minutes for jobs to trigger or cancel.

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

openshift-ci Bot commented May 26, 2026

@yahlifried: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/rehearse/openshift/metallb-operator/main/operator-e2e 4699648 link unknown /pj-rehearse pull-ci-openshift-metallb-operator-main-operator-e2e

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants