Improve Expectation integration test

[Donnerbart]

From my understanding it's not optimal to use the context from the current reconciliation in Expectation.createExpectation(). This will hog on that specific instance, including the (cloned) primary resource instance that is internally stored in DefaultContext. This could have a bad impact on GC, and I think it could even lead to bugs when context.getPrimaryResource() is used in the expectation (since that primary resource might have outdated data).

The Expectation.createExpectation(name, predicate) provides the primary and context, that should be preferred to be used.

Fixed the integration test and references in the documentation and blog post. Also fixed all warnings in the test and re-ordered the methods by their usage in the code. Fixed the time unit for the timeout (from seconds to millis).

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR improves the Expectation integration test by fixing an anti-pattern where the reconciliation context was incorrectly captured in the createExpectation() closure. The fix prevents potential memory issues and bugs related to stale primary resource data.

Key changes:

• Removed context parameter from deploymentReadyExpectation() method to use lambda-provided context instead of captured outer context
• Fixed spelling error: renamed pathchStatusWithMessage to patchStatusWithMessage
• Improved code quality: better variable naming (d → deployment), long literal fix (30000l → 30000L), comment improvements, method reordering

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 3 out of 3 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.

File	Description
operator-framework/src/test/java/io/javaoperatorsdk/operator/baseapi/expectation/ExpectationReconciler.java	Fixed expectation method to use lambda-provided context, corrected spelling, improved variable names and comments, reordered methods
docs/content/en/docs/documentation/reconciler.md	Updated documentation to remove context parameter from deploymentReadyExpectation() call
docs/content/en/blog/releases/v5-2-release.md	Updated blog post example to remove context parameter from deploymentReadyExpectation() call

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[csviri]

LGTM, thank you!

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 4 out of 4 changed files in this pull request and generated no new comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[csviri]

From my understanding it's not optimal to use the context from the current reconciliation in Expectation.createExpectation(). This will hog on that specific instance, including the (cloned) primary resource instance that is internally stored in DefaultContext. This could have a bad impact on GC, and I think it could even lead to bugs when context.getPrimaryResource() is used in the expectation (since that primary resource might have outdated data).
The Expectation.createExpectation(name, predicate) provides the primary and context, that should be preferred to be used.

Absolutely, nice catch, thank you!