Code maintenance/71761 include op blocknote hocuspocus in openproject core repository

[akabiru]

Merging opf/op-blocknote-hocuspocus into opf/openproject as the two are closely coupled and shall always be released in lockstep anyway.

Ticket

https://community.openproject.org/wp/71761

[github-actions]

Dependency Review

The following issues were found:

• ❌ 1 vulnerable package(s)
• ✅ 0 package(s) with incompatible licenses
• ✅ 0 package(s) with invalid SPDX license definitions
• ⚠️ 3 package(s) with unknown licenses.
• ⚠️ 38 packages with OpenSSF Scorecard issues.

View full job summary

[machisuji]

I've finally finished the necessary dockerization and continuous delivery workflows for the merge.

I've tested both

1. hocuspocus builds as part of the on-prem docker release and nightly builds (scheduled and tagged docker workflows) (see example run)
2. hocuspocus builds as a result of pushes to opf/openproject (while changing hocuspocus files or the hocuspocus docker workflow) (see example run)

Both runs are red because they are test runs and I didn't actually want to deploy anything. Just pay attention to the "Deploy nothing" inputs to confirm that the right tags would have been deployed. Here is an example for a green case for (1) demonstrating that hocuspocus is successfully built as a precondition for OpenProject, and is then used in its build.

I have removed the code allowing for debugging of the workflows in 35d6604

You can check the built images here.
For example:

• code-maintenance-71761-include-op-blocknote-hocuspocus-in-openproject-core-repository-f50cd32e
• 17.5.42

This means from a CI perspective, this is now good to merge.

[machisuji]

The CLA assistant complains because of this Copilot fix optimizing imports. I say we can ignore that in this case. Although I will double check.

edit: no it was complaining about an external contribution that I hadn't seen since it was collapsed.