[XWI-153] Renamed "Internal wiki" → "Project wiki"

[shiroginne]

Ticket

XWI-153

What are you trying to accomplish?

Self-titled.

Screenshots

Merge checklist

• Added/updated tests
• Added/updated documentation in Lookbook (patterns, previews, etc)
• Tested major browsers (Chrome, Firefox, Edge, ...)

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./modules/overviews/spec/features/managing_dashboard_page_spec.rb[1:1:1]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24632, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./modules/overviews/spec/features/managing_dashboard_page_spec.rb[1:1:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24632. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24632 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @shiroginne to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @shiroginne, and request a review from @shiroginne.
On every commit, set @shiroginne as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./modules/backlogs/spec/features/inbox_column_spec.rb[1:7:1]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24632, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./modules/backlogs/spec/features/inbox_column_spec.rb[1:7:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24632. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24632 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @shiroginne to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @shiroginne, and request a review from @shiroginne.
On every commit, set @shiroginne as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.

[NobodysNightmare]

❗ Outdated

We changed this. Question is whether that change was part of 17.7 or 17.8 (CC @mereghost )

[NobodysNightmare]

(also docs below are outdated w.r.t. this)

[NobodysNightmare]

To clarify: The whole NOTE box that I commented at here is outdated. As far as I can tell, since 17.7 we now do prevent the creation of project wikis when the global setting is disabled.

Also texts further down on this page here need to be adapted accordingly.

[MayaBerd]

Yes, I think you are right. This is however the change for 17.7. I'll do it on that (17.7) branch.

[NobodysNightmare]

OMG, and I am about to change this behaviour with 17.8, where the settings page remains visible...

So we partially updated our docs, but not completely 🙈

[NobodysNightmare]

I can't find anything wrong with the changes of this PR, except for the side-find of other docs being outdated (and me being concerned that we'll cause merge conflicts if we fix those).

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./modules/wikis/spec/features/admin/internal_provider_spec.rb[1:1]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24632, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./modules/wikis/spec/features/admin/internal_provider_spec.rb[1:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24632. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24632 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @shiroginne to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @shiroginne, and request a review from @shiroginne.
On every commit, set @shiroginne as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.

[shiroginne]

Thanks! I'll contact @MayaBerd regarding the docs; we'll cook something up (I hope 😅)

[NobodysNightmare]

ah, spotted something I overlooked at first

[NobodysNightmare]

This is a very generic translation for wikis/internal_provider. Thus it has to be either:

• always singular
• or properly pluralized

You can look at the surrounding translations for proper pluralization. This also means that if you have places that currently do something like InternalProvider.model_name.human, you might want to replace those with InternalProvider.model_name.human(count: 2).

[shiroginne]

Done ✅

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./spec/features/roles/report_spec.rb[1:1]
• rspec ./spec/features/roles/report_spec.rb[1:3]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24632, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./spec/features/roles/report_spec.rb[1:1]`
- `rspec ./spec/features/roles/report_spec.rb[1:3]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24632. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24632 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @shiroginne to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @shiroginne, and request a review from @shiroginne.
On every commit, set @shiroginne as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.

[github-actions]

Warning

Flaky specs

• rspec ./modules/backlogs/spec/features/inbox_column_spec.rb[1:7:1]
• rspec ./spec/features/activities/work_package/activities_spec.rb[1:5:2:1]

🤖 Ask Copilot to investigate

Copy the prompt below into a new comment on this PR to delegate the investigation to GitHub Copilot. It will look into the flakiness and open a separate pull request with you as reviewer.

@copilot The following spec(s) are flaky in CI (first seen on PR #24632, linked for reference only):

- `rspec ./modules/backlogs/spec/features/inbox_column_spec.rb[1:7:1]`
- `rspec ./spec/features/activities/work_package/activities_spec.rb[1:5:2:1]`

Treat this as a standalone task, unrelated to PR #24632. Create a new branch from origin/dev and open a new pull request targeting dev — do not stack it on PR #24632 or reuse that branch.

Follow the playbook in docs/development/testing/handling-flaky-tests/README.md to find the root cause and fix the underlying race — do not skip, delete, or weaken the spec to make it pass; disabling is a last resort per the playbook, and only with a bug ticket. Verify the fix by running the spec(s) repeatedly (e.g. `script/bulk_run_rspec --run-count 10`).

If you cannot reproduce the flake or are not confident in a fix after reasonable investigation, do not fabricate a change or skip the spec to force CI green. Instead, leave the pull request in draft and document what you tried, the suspected cause, and any leads in its description, then assign @shiroginne to take over.

Once the fix is verified, title the PR after the spec(s) it fixes, and use the PR description to explain the root cause, how the change resolves it, and the before/after results. Label the PR `flaky-spec`, assign @shiroginne, and request a review from @shiroginne.
On every commit, set @shiroginne as the sole co-author with a `Co-authored-by:` trailer (use their GitHub no-reply email so it links to their account), so it is traceable who dispatched the fix.