Skip to content

docs: align research doc Tier 4 with OEM Reference Design rename - #16

Merged
oratis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/sad-wu-174680
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

docs: align research doc Tier 4 with OEM Reference Design rename#16
oratis merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
claude/sad-wu-174680

Conversation

@oratis

@oratis oratis commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

背景

docs/research/hardware-drivers-and-migration.md §5 的 Tier 4 — Reference 仍沿用旧语义,把「Reference」当作最高的 OEM 整机层。这与权威定义 crates/andromeda-hardware/src/model.rs 中的 SupportTier 阶梯冲突——那里 blocked < community < reference < supported < certifiedreference 实为次低级、只有虚拟(L0–L2)证据的档位。

PR #11 已在 docs/product-development-plan.md §6.2 和 docs/os-landscape-and-andromeda-architecture.md §3.2 完成同名修正,但未覆盖该研究文档(超出其 scope)。本 PR 补齐这一处一致性。

改动

  • 标题改名:### Tier 4 — Reference### Tier 4 — OEM Reference Design(顶层硬件产品线)
  • 新增澄清句:OEM Reference Design 是产品线里程碑,不是 SupportTier 枚举取值;给出权威阶梯来源与完整阶梯,说明代码里的 reference 反而是次低级虚拟证据档。

范围最小化:Phase H4:OEM Reference 与结尾 "OEM Reference Hardware" 已带 OEM 前缀、无旧语义歧义,且不属于 Tier 4 定义段落,保持原样。

1 文件,+3/-1,纯文档。

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

The Tier 4 heading in docs/research/hardware-drivers-and-migration.md
still used the old semantics where "Reference" is the top OEM tier,
conflicting with the authoritative SupportTier ladder in
crates/andromeda-hardware/src/model.rs
(blocked < community < reference < supported < certified), where
`reference` is the second-lowest, virtual-only evidence tier.

PR #11 already renamed the top "Tier 4 Reference" to "OEM Reference
Design" in the product plan §6.2 and architecture doc §3.2 but left
this research doc untouched (out of that PR's scope). Rename the
heading and add a clarifying note that OEM Reference Design is a
product-line milestone, NOT the SupportTier `reference` value.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
@oratis
oratis merged commit f8a2ad0 into main Aug 2, 2026
4 checks passed
@oratis
oratis deleted the claude/sad-wu-174680 branch August 2, 2026 04:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant