Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

I strongly disagree with this proposal on multiple grounds, the main one being a duplication of the work for the volunteer maintainers of the project for limited benefit.

For small and large projects, this creates a repetitive update cycle. For example, changing a GitHub username, repository URL, release tag, or metadata requires editing the formula, pushing changes, validating, fixing checksums, and repeating the process.

Changing a GitHub username or git url happens about once a month across Homebrew, so it can't be that much of a burden. Version updates are covered by brew bump, which we strongly recommend over manual edits. So we would be optimizing there for something that maintain…

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Answer selected by p-linnane
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
3 participants