Best practices for handling rate limits when using the REST API for frequent polling #156480
Select Topic AreaQuestion BodyHi everyone, I'm working on an integration that uses GitHub's REST API to poll for updates on issues and pull requests every few minutes. I understand that there are rate limits in place, and I'm looking for best practices or recommended strategies to stay within those limits while still keeping data relatively fresh. Some specific questions I had: Is there a preferred way to reduce API calls, like using conditional requests (ETags)? Would webhooks be more efficient for this use case? Are there known patterns or tools that help manage GitHub API rate limits effectively? I’d love to hear how others have approached this, or if GitHub recommends a specific method for frequent syncs. Thanks in advance! |
Replies: 6 comments
|
I think webhooks will be the best option. |
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
|
Hi @AayuAmor 👋 Great questions — you're thinking in exactly the right direction. Polling GitHub’s REST API can work, but to keep things efficient and stay within rate limits, here are some best practices and answers to your specific points: ✅ 1. Yes — Use Conditional Requests (ETags) "Has this resource changed since I last saw it?" If nothing changed, GitHub returns 304 Not Modified — which doesn’t count against your rate limit. ✅ Recommended: Store ETags from responses and reuse them in future requests. Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#conditional-requests ✅ 2. Yes — Webhooks Are More Efficient (When Available) New issues / PRs Status updates Comments or label changes ➡️ GitHub webhooks are the preferred approach. They're real-time, lightweight, and don't count against rate limits. Downside: You’ll need a public server or service (like ngrok or a cloud function) to receive the POST requests. Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/webhooks ✅ 3. Known Patterns & Tools Efficient Polling: If polling is your only option (e.g. rate-limited orgs, legacy infra), space out requests using a priority queue and differentiated polling intervals (e.g., active PRs every 5 min, stale ones every 30). Caching Layer: Use a lightweight cache or state store so your app only calls GitHub when data is actually stale. Libraries: If you're using Node, Python, etc., some GitHub API clients already support ETag handling and rate limit backoff (e.g. octokit for JS). |
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
|
Hi @AayuAmor 👋 Great question — you’re right that polling every few minutes can hit GitHub’s REST API rate limits pretty quickly. A few strategies that usually help: ==Use conditional requests (ETags / If-None-Match headers): ==Prefer webhooks where possible: ==Combine REST with GraphQL if needed: ==Use caching and backoff strategies: ==Tools & patterns: If your integration requires “near real time” updates, the best practice is usually webhooks first + occasional syncs via conditional requests to catch anything that might have been missed. Hope this helps you design a reliable sync strategy 🚀 |
|
🕒 Discussion Activity Reminder 🕒 This Discussion has been labeled as dormant by an automated system for having no activity in the last 60 days. Please consider one the following actions: 1️⃣ Close as Out of Date: If the topic is no longer relevant, close the Discussion as 2️⃣ Provide More Information: Share additional details or context — or let the community know if you've found a solution on your own. 3️⃣ Mark a Reply as Answer: If your question has been answered by a reply, mark the most helpful reply as the solution. Note: This dormant notification will only apply to Discussions with the Thank you for helping bring this Discussion to a resolution! 💬 |
Hi @AayuAmor 👋 Great questions — you're thinking in exactly the right direction.
Polling GitHub’s REST API can work, but to keep things efficient and stay within rate limits, here are some best practices and answers to your specific points:
✅ 1. Yes — Use Conditional Requests (ETags)
GitHub REST API supports ETags and the If-None-Match header, which lets you ask:
"Has this resource changed since I last saw it?"
If nothing changed, GitHub returns 304 Not Modified — which doesn’t count against your rate limit.
✅ Recommended: Store ETags from responses and reuse them in future requests.
Docs: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/overview/resources-in-the-rest-api#conditional-requests
✅ 2. Yes — W…