Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

We always recommend you do some testing / bench marking to see what works best for your specific audio and use cases.

But In our Docs we say:

https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/models-languages-overview

nova-3: Recommended for most use cases, especially audio with multiple languages, background noise, crosstalk and far field audio
nova-2: Recommended for use cases with non-English transcription, and filler word identification.
So I'd assume if you have a single language to process, using Nova-2 might be better than using a multi-lingual model with Nova-3 to do that processing.

Currently Key Terms are only available on Nova-3 for English

https://developers.deepgram.com/docs/keyterm

Replies: 4 comments 1 reply

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies
Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
1 reply
@anotine10
Comment options

Answer selected by deepgram-community
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
2 participants