|
Hello, I'm currently working with OpenThread, for devices where the OpenThread part will be implemented as either RCP/NCP. We first planned to use an OpenThread NCP to offload as much as possible to the radio SoC. However, we saw that the
Thanks for your work, and thanks in advance for your time :) |
Replies: 1 comment 2 replies
We are actively working to build out NCP support. We are not planning to use wpantund going forward. Instead, we plan to continue enhancing the existing
We are working on adding CLI support for NCP. See openthread/ot-br-posix#2773
We plan to support both RCP and NCP. Each model has their own benefit depending on the device requirements. |
Hi @P-D-G,
You can still use
ot-br-posixeven you don't want border router features. You can disable all the Border Routing features and it will simply be the same as ot-daemon. It can be seen as OT on posix. For example, the Thread stack on AOSP is also built from ot-br-posix but it may not be a border router. (mobile for example) Our general direction is to use ot-br-posix so we don't develop on OT posix anymore.Regarding
ot-ctl(CLI command support in NCP mode), it's under development and will soon be ready. openthread/ot-br-posix#2773