I hope there can be a lightweight version, just a storage bucket #27366
Replies: 3 comments 4 replies
|
Hi there, thanks for opening. Are the cases you are talking about for Supabase? Supabase itself a platform with each component pretty integrated into it. For example, Storage uses the database to store the object metadata and integrates with Auth to control access. When you do not need to use some features, you are welcome to not use them (i.e. some people use a different Auth provider). In the self-hosted version, each component uses pretty minimal resources, but most are needed. If you are talking about the repository size, we have a guide in our docs under the In those cases where you just need storage, have you considered using Minio? |
|
Hi everyone, due to inactivity on this issue I've moved the issue over to discussions/enhancements. |
I prepared two languages, Chinese and English, Chinese is the most original text. English is translated by AI中文是,我曾经使用过,但是minio的一些api和逻辑不太有效。和supabase相比就太难用了。如果全量部署,低配置的服务器,直接卡死了,直接负载100%(使用的是2核2G 10M带宽) 我改成2核4G就是分正常 EnglishYes, I have used it before, but some of Minio's APIs and logic are not very effective. Compared to Supabase, it is too difficult to use. If fully deployed on a low-configured server, it will be completely blocked and the load will reach 100% (using a 2-core 2G 10Mbps connection). Changing to a 2-core 4G configuration will make it normal. Furthermore, I think that if it can support private storage buckets, its market prospect is very good. Because buying a CDN is not only expensive, but also has the risk of fraud. However, most people only want to use it as a file storage to manage files conveniently. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
In many cases, we don't need too many things, such as databases. We just need its storage bucket.
All reactions