-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.1k
Typo in whichOpenOffice test #10823
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Typo in whichOpenOffice test #10823
Conversation
|
Thanks a lot for your contribution! Contributions to the core repo require a signed contributors agreement http://owncloud.org/contribute/agreement/ Alternatively you can add a comment here stating that this contribution is MIT licensed. Some more details about out pull request workflow can be found here: http://owncloud.org/code-reviews-on-github/ |
|
The inspection completed: No new issues |
|
This contribution is MIT licensed, but seriously, it should just be updated upstream |
|
@oparoz Hey there. Just to clearify, what do you mean with upstream in this case? |
|
I meant, it's a typo and should just be updated when the file is next touched, but I suppose it's easier to not forget by just merging my change. |
Sorry, that's just not how development works.
Your pull request is much appreciated, thanks. |
|
@georgehrke Please have a look. The logic doesn't seem to make too much sense to me, btw. If you find libreoffice, why would you keep looking for openoffice? |
|
👍 fix makes sense |
It just checks if either libreoffice or openoffice is installed. I don't think it's a big deal that it checks openoffice as well |
|
Is that typo present in master and stable6 as well? @oparoz can you double check? THX |
I don't know whether this code is hot or not. Just wanted to point out that unnecessary work is being done. Not sure how expensive shell_exec calls are, they might be depending on what happens in the background, e.g. actually setting up a new shell. |
|
@DeepDiver1975, indeed, both stable 6 and master have the same typo. |
|
👍 Agree with fix but i think @bantu Comment needs attention because it is a completely unnecessary additional check |
|
@owncloud-bot ok to test |
|
🚀 Test Passed. 🚀 |
|
👍 |
|
NO! What? Why is that going to stable7 ? |
|
@karlitschek should we revert or is this backport material ? |
|
@oparoz please only send pull requests to master, not stable7. They might selectively be backported. |
|
Pushed to master as bbc2d7c Waiting for confirmation from @karlitschek whether we need to revert on stable7. |
|
@PVince81, will do! Sorry about that. |
|
@karlitschek Please see #10823 (comment) |
|
@PVince81 yes please |
|
@karlitschek yes revert or yes keep the backport ? |
|
Hehe sorry. :-) Let´s keep the backport. |
|
Port to master is already here: bbc2d7c |
No description provided.