Skip to content

Sort out api sharing test group membership to match with user_ldap#35746

Merged
phil-davis merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
api-sharing-tests-groups
Jul 3, 2019
Merged

Sort out api sharing test group membership to match with user_ldap#35746
phil-davis merged 1 commit intomasterfrom
api-sharing-tests-groups

Conversation

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@phil-davis phil-davis commented Jul 3, 2019

Description

Reviewed the has been added to group steps in the sharing API test scenarios. Sorted them out so that they have group membership that matches what is used in user_ldap.

This should make user_ldap pass again, and improve some tests that were not really testing quite the right scenario when running in user_ldap

Related Issue

owncloud/user_ldap#433 - fix it for now
owncloud/user_ldap#250 - we should make this better long-term

Motivation and Context

How Has This Been Tested?

CI

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

Open tasks:

  • Backport (if applicable set "backport-request" label and remove when the backport was done)

@phil-davis phil-davis force-pushed the api-sharing-tests-groups branch from 1a6e073 to e17ced4 Compare July 3, 2019 02:57
@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Backport stable10 #35747

@phil-davis phil-davis merged commit 42fcca3 into master Jul 3, 2019
@delete-merged-branch delete-merged-branch Bot deleted the api-sharing-tests-groups branch July 3, 2019 04:25
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants