Skip to content

Bump js-yaml from 3.10.0 to 3.13.1 in /build#35984

Closed
patrickjahns wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-js-yaml-3.13.1
Closed

Bump js-yaml from 3.10.0 to 3.13.1 in /build#35984
patrickjahns wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
update-js-yaml-3.13.1

Conversation

@patrickjahns
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Description

Port of #35538

Related Issue

⛔️

Motivation and Context

Update dependency also on new stable10

How Has This Been Tested?

🤖

Screenshots (if appropriate):

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Database schema changes (next release will require increase of minor version instead of patch)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Technical debt
  • Tests only (no source changes)

Checklist:

  • Code changes
  • Unit tests added
  • Acceptance tests added
  • Documentation ticket raised:

Open tasks:

  • Backport (if applicable set "backport-request" label and remove when the backport was done)

Bumps [js-yaml](https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml) from 3.10.0 to 3.13.1.
- [Release notes](https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/releases)
- [Changelog](https://github.com/nodeca/js-yaml/blob/master/CHANGELOG.md)
- [Commits](nodeca/js-yaml@3.10.0...3.13.1)

Signed-off-by: dependabot[bot] <support@github.com>
@patrickjahns patrickjahns added this to the development milestone Aug 6, 2019
@patrickjahns patrickjahns self-assigned this Aug 6, 2019
@CLAassistant
Copy link
Copy Markdown

CLA assistant check
Thank you for your submission, we really appreciate it. Like many open source projects, we ask that you sign our Contributor License Agreement before we can accept your contribution.
You have signed the CLA already but the status is still pending? Let us recheck it.

@phil-davis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@patrickjahns this is reporting a conflict

@patrickjahns
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

superseeded by #35986

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants