CodeRabbit Generated Unit Tests: Generate unit tests for PR changes

[coderabbitai]

Unit test generation was requested by @panbanda.

• Fix Graphify audit findings #414 (comment)

The following files were modified:

• src/analyzers/complexity.rs
• src/mcp/mod.rs
• src/semantic/sync.rs
• tests/integration_tests.rs

[coderabbitai]

Important

Review skipped

This PR was authored by the user configured for CodeRabbit reviews. CodeRabbit does not review PRs authored by this user. It's recommended to use a dedicated user account to post CodeRabbit review feedback.

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: ec566358-e60d-4497-9bf1-ce84104fd803

You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:

• 🔍 Trigger review

---

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[github-actions]

Omen Analysis

Diff Risk

Risk Score	48%
Risk Level	MEDIUM
Files Modified	4
Lines Added	+389
Lines Deleted	-15
Commits	2

Risk Factors

Factor	Score
lines_added	0.1556
file_churn	0.1
entropy	0.0880
file_complexity	0.0241
num_files	0.0213
ownership_diffusion	0.0180
commits	0.0140
lines_deleted	0.006

Recommendations

• Touches historically volatile files - changes here often introduce bugs

Repository Health

Health Score	77.96482693002115 / 100
Grade	C
Files Analyzed	101
Critical Issues	1

Score Components

Component	Score	Weight
complexity	93	1
duplication	41.9	0.8
cohesion	94.2	0.6
tdg	85.2	0.6
coupling	53.1	0.4
satd	91.1	0.4
smells	100	0.2

Tips for AI agents

Use these commands to investigate and improve low-scoring areas.

Run full analysis:

omen -f json score    # health score with component breakdown
omen -f json diff     # PR risk analysis
omen hotspot          # high-churn + high-complexity files

Coupling (score: 53.110891089108904) -- needs attention

omen graph && omen smells

Break cyclic dependencies by introducing interfaces or extracting shared types. Reduce fan-out from hub modules by splitting responsibilities.

---

Duplication (score: 41.934343736895705) -- needs attention

omen clones

Look for Type-1 (exact) and Type-2 (renamed) clones. Extract shared logic into reusable functions or modules. Prioritize clones in high-churn files.

---

General workflow for improving scores:

1. Run the relevant analyzer command to identify specific files
2. Focus on the highest-weight components first (complexity 25%, duplication 20%, cohesion 15%, TDG 15%)
3. Make targeted improvements -- small refactors that reduce complexity or eliminate duplication
4. Re-run omen score to verify improvement