Skip to content

add patch tunnels to device api - #183

Merged
danielspofford merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jwong/eng-1573-implement-device-api-patch-tunnelstunnel_prn
May 4, 2024
Merged

add patch tunnels to device api#183
danielspofford merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
jwong/eng-1573-implement-device-api-patch-tunnelstunnel_prn

Conversation

@jasontwong

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

Comment thread src/openapi/peridio-device-openapi.yaml Outdated
Comment thread src/openapi/peridio-device-openapi.yaml Outdated

@danielspofford danielspofford left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Only closed.

@jasontwong
jasontwong force-pushed the jwong/eng-1573-implement-device-api-patch-tunnelstunnel_prn branch from 7fa6911 to b5199c4 Compare May 2, 2024 15:38
@jasontwong
jasontwong requested a review from danielspofford May 2, 2024 15:40

@danielspofford danielspofford left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Screenshot 2024-05-03 at 9 31 43 AM

  1. Match style of "Configure a tunnel" above it.
  2. Same thing, look at style of how this shows up for configure a tunnel and match it.
  3. Full sentences here means period at end.
  4. Ignore this markup, I was going to say you need to also mark the state field itself (not just the overall body) as required, but I changed my mind. I actually think I will comment on the other PR and make sure the update succeeds even when asking to change nothing...

@jasontwong
jasontwong force-pushed the jwong/eng-1573-implement-device-api-patch-tunnelstunnel_prn branch from b5199c4 to e7f6a72 Compare May 3, 2024 20:12
@danielspofford
danielspofford merged commit ca356a4 into main May 4, 2024
@danielspofford
danielspofford deleted the jwong/eng-1573-implement-device-api-patch-tunnelstunnel_prn branch May 4, 2024 03:06
jetm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 15, 2026
The table listed #293 as a separate gate and #183 as draft. #293 is closed - its
Tegra BSP staging is the first commit of #292 now - and #183 left draft once the
Jetson work supplied the motivation its last unexplained commit was missing. A
gate list that names a closed PR teaches a reader to distrust the rest of it.

Adding #276 is the substantive part rather than bookkeeping. The verification
section asks the reader to read /proc/device-tree on the booted board, and a
stock image sets root's password field to `*`, so the board boots to a prompt
that cannot be satisfied and the check cannot be run at all. The page was
describing a procedure its own supported images block. The dev-login kas
overlays are what unblock it, so they are a dependency of this page in the same
way the delivery hooks are.

Say plainly that this makes the verified image differ from the shipped one.
Neither overlay touches the device tree, so the result still holds, but a reader
who notices the gap deserves the reasoning rather than having to reconstruct
whether it invalidates the check.

Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <javier@peridio.com>
jetm added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 17, 2026
The table listed #293 as a separate gate and #183 as draft. #293 is closed - its
Tegra BSP staging is the first commit of #292 now - and #183 left draft once the
Jetson work supplied the motivation its last unexplained commit was missing. A
gate list that names a closed PR teaches a reader to distrust the rest of it.

Adding #276 is the substantive part rather than bookkeeping. The verification
section asks the reader to read /proc/device-tree on the booted board, and a
stock image sets root's password field to `*`, so the board boots to a prompt
that cannot be satisfied and the check cannot be run at all. The page was
describing a procedure its own supported images block. The dev-login kas
overlays are what unblock it, so they are a dependency of this page in the same
way the delivery hooks are.

Say plainly that this makes the verified image differ from the shipped one.
Neither overlay touches the device tree, so the result still holds, but a reader
who notices the gap deserves the reasoning rather than having to reconstruct
whether it invalidates the check.

Signed-off-by: Javier Tia <javier@peridio.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants