Skip to content

Make Should-Throw -Because named-only - #2937

Merged
nohwnd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-2932-should-throw-because-named
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

Make Should-Throw -Because named-only#2937
nohwnd merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix-2932-should-throw-because-named

Conversation

@nohwnd

@nohwnd nohwnd commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Fix #2932

-Because on Should-Throw was positional, unlike the other assertions where it is named-only. Made it named-only.

🤖

@nohwnd nohwnd added this to the 6.1.0 milestone Jul 31, 2026
@nohwnd
nohwnd merged commit d8267fb into main Jul 31, 2026
13 checks passed
@nohwnd
nohwnd deleted the fix-2932-should-throw-because-named branch July 31, 2026 18:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Should-Throw makes -Because positional, it should be named only

1 participant