feat: implement issue #449 — Compliance: stub-surface-drift-feature-ideation.yml-on

[don-petry]

Closes #449

Implemented by dev-lead agent. Please review.

[chatgpt-codex-connector]

You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard.

[gemini-code-assist]

Note

Gemini is unable to generate a review for this pull request due to the file types involved not being currently supported.

[coderabbitai]

Warning

Review limit reached

@don-petry, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 46 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 67bb7d12-b597-4e2f-9916-75009decb8a7

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 0fb5caf and 4360e63.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)

• .github/workflows/feature-ideation.yml

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch dev-lead/issue-449-20260717-1400

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.}

[sonarqubecloud]

Quality Gate passed

Issues
0 New issues
0 Accepted issues

Measures
0 Security Hotspots
0.0% Coverage on New Code
0.0% Duplication on New Code

See analysis details on SonarQube Cloud

[Copilot]

Copilot encountered an error and was unable to review this pull request. You can try again by re-requesting a review.

Note

This error may be related to your runner configuration. You can now configure runners for Copilot code review separately from Copilot cloud agent by creating a copilot-code-review.yml file with your setup steps. Read the docs for details.

[don-petry]

Dev-Lead — fix-bot-comment (no-changes)

Agent reasoning

### Analysis
The SonarCloud Quality Gate passed with **zero actionable issues**:
- ✅ 0 New issues
- ✅ 0 Security Hotspots  
- ✅ 0.0% Coverage on New Code (informational only)
- ✅ 0.0% Duplication on New Code (informational only)
The PR's single file change adds two new workflow input parameters (`enhance_backlog` and `target_discussion`) to the feature-ideation workflow. These declarative inputs introduce no code quality concerns and were validated by all code analysis tools (Node.js Tests, CodeQL, Analyze jobs—all passing).
### Tier 1 Blocker Note
The "dev-lead / dispatch" check failed, but this is a workflow infrastructure issue rather than a code quality issue. The SonarCloud bot (the code analysis tool) found 0 issues and the Quality Gate passed. No code changes are required to address the bot's findings.
**No code changes needed.** The PR is ready from a code quality perspective per the SonarCloud analysis.

[don-petry]

Closing as part of the open-PR drain (50-PR automation cap). This branch has real merge conflicts with main and cannot be rebased automatically; the linked compliance issue remains OPEN so dev-lead can regenerate a clean PR once there is cap headroom. No work is lost.