feat: implement issue #301 — Compliance: non-stub-feature-ideation.yml - #322
feat: implement issue #301 — Compliance: non-stub-feature-ideation.yml#322don-petry wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
You have reached your Codex usage limits for code reviews. You can see your limits in the Codex usage dashboard. |
|
Warning You have reached your daily quota limit. Please wait up to 24 hours and I will start processing your requests again! |
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 51 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
Dev-Lead — review-changes (no-changes)No changes were needed for this PR. |
|
Advisory bots were rate-limited; auto-approval is withheld until they recover. pr-review-sweep will re-review this PR after 2026-07-15T03:42:16Z. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR aims to remediate Issue #301 by updating the repo’s centralized feature-ideation.yml workflow so it correctly delegates to the org’s reusable Feature Ideation workflow in a compliant, standardized way.
Changes:
- Added new
workflow_dispatchinputs (enhance_backlog,target_discussion) and introducedredispatch+prepjobs to bridgediscussion:createdintoworkflow_dispatchand to resolve inputs via job outputs. - Updated the reusable workflow reference and rewired
with:values to useneeds.prep.outputs.*(includingfromJSONcasts for booleans). - Updated comments/docs within the workflow to describe the new bridging behavior and input-resolution approach.
| id-token: write | ||
| actions: read | ||
| uses: petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/feature-ideation-reusable.yml@ed5676d2b1ea418efc56e93bccba2e175d0802b7 # v1 | ||
| uses: petry-projects/.github/.github/workflows/feature-ideation-reusable.yml@feature-ideation/stable # NOSONAR(githubactions:S7637) first-party channel ref | ||
| with: |
| # ── #963 discussion→dispatch redispatch bridge ─────────────────────────────── | ||
| # claude-code-action aborts on `discussion` event contexts ("Unsupported event | ||
| # type: discussion"). So on `discussion: created` we do NOT call the reusable | ||
| # inline; the `redispatch` job re-invokes this workflow via workflow_dispatch | ||
| # (under which the action runs cleanly), passing the number as target_discussion. | ||
| # Mirrors initiative-planner.yml's redispatch (#618). The `ideate` reusable call | ||
| # then runs only on workflow_dispatch/schedule. | ||
| redispatch: |
|
Auto-rebase is skipping this PR. It has merge conflicts with To unblock, do one of:
|
|
Closing as part of the open-PR drain (50-PR automation cap). This branch has real merge conflicts with main and cannot be rebased automatically; the linked compliance issue remains OPEN so dev-lead can regenerate a clean PR once there is cap headroom. No work is lost. |
Pull request was closed



Closes #301
Implemented by dev-lead agent. Please review.