Skip to content

docs: remove deprecated CLI from lolor docs#43

Merged
mason-sharp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/remove-deprecated-cli
Jul 20, 2026
Merged

docs: remove deprecated CLI from lolor docs#43
mason-sharp merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/remove-deprecated-cli

Conversation

@AntTheLimey

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

What

The pgEdge CLI is deprecated, but the lolor docs still instruct users
to install with ./pgedge um install and to add tables to a
replication set with ./pgedge spock repset-add-table. This rewrites
those instructions to be deployment-aware and SQL-based.

docs/install_configure.md

  • Replaces ./pgedge um install lolor with a platform/source install:
    lolor ships with pgEdge Distributed/Enterprise Postgres (the Control
    Plane installs the package per node), or build from source with PGXS.
  • Removes the leftover "um module" reference in the CREATE EXTENSION
    lead-in.
  • Replaces the two ./pgedge spock repset-add-table commands with
    SELECT spock.repset_add_table(...) run in the lolor database.

README.md

  • Applies the same spock.repset_add_table() SQL replacement for the
    replication-set instructions.

Verification

  • spock.repset_add_table('set', 'schema.table') signature confirmed
    against Spock's regression suite.
  • Control Plane packaging of lolor confirmed in control-plane.
  • No residual ./pgedge / CLI references remain in the docs.

Targets main; picked up by the next tagged lolor release.

Note: the Configuring section's lolor.node range ("1 to 2^28") looks
incorrect - the source caps it at 16 - but that is unrelated to the CLI
cleanup and is left untouched here.

The pgEdge CLI is deprecated. Update the install and
replication-set instructions to describe platform deployment
and use spock.repset_add_table() SQL in place of ./pgedge
commands, across docs/install_configure.md and README.md.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 20, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Warning

Review limit reached

@AntTheLimey, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 58 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 427a46fd-69f4-418e-b3d5-fcab5a6c1c0d

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between e4949b4 and 84c225d.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • README.md
  • docs/install_configure.md
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch docs/remove-deprecated-cli

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@codacy-production

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Up to standards ✅

🟢 Issues 0 issues

Results:
0 new issues

View in Codacy

NEW Get contextual insights on your PRs based on Codacy's metrics, along with PR and Jira context, without leaving GitHub. Enable AI reviewer
TIP This summary will be updated as you push new changes.

@AntTheLimey
AntTheLimey requested a review from mason-sharp July 20, 2026 18:43
@mason-sharp
mason-sharp merged commit d964e39 into main Jul 20, 2026
9 of 10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants