fix: respect prepared_statements setting - #679
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Closed
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. 📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know! |
dev-lew
pushed a commit
to dev-lew/pgdog
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2026
pgdogdev#677 Prepared statements engine was acting as if `prepared_statements = "full"` was default, and rewriting `PREPARE` and `EXECUTE` commands (incorrectly, inside transactions) even though `prepared_statements = "extended"` is actually the default.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#677
Prepared statements engine was acting as if
prepared_statements = "full"was default, and rewritingPREPAREandEXECUTEcommands (incorrectly, inside transactions) even thoughprepared_statements = "extended"is actually the default.