use dplyr::bind_rows in ard_stack instead of bind_ard and remove ard_stack class - #592
use dplyr::bind_rows in ard_stack instead of bind_ard and remove ard_stack class#592alanahjonas95 wants to merge 9 commits into
ard_stack instead of bind_ard and remove ard_stack class#592Conversation
Unit Tests Summary 1 files 277 suites 25s ⏱️ Results for commit 2b40553. ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
Code Coverage SummaryDiff against mainResults for commit: fcf9bf7 Minimum allowed coverage is ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results |
Unit Test Performance DifferenceAdditional test case details
Results for commit f40c2f9 ♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results. |
| # Verify ard_stack class is assigned and ordered correctly | ||
| expect_s3_class(ard1, "ard_stack") | ||
| expect_identical(class(ard1)[1], "ard_stack") |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
let's add this back as well, thanks
There was a problem hiding this comment.
added these tests back in
Signed-off-by: Alanah Jonas <156101954+alanahjonas95@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alanah Jonas <156101954+alanahjonas95@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alanah Jonas <156101954+alanahjonas95@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alanah Jonas <156101954+alanahjonas95@users.noreply.github.com>
Signed-off-by: Alanah Jonas <156101954+alanahjonas95@users.noreply.github.com>
|
@ddsjoberg i do have one question/issue about this change to use bind_rows though, currently bind_ard removes duplicate rows, but we lose that funcionality if we use bind_rows instead, i know this is a bad example / probably not something someone would do: |
|
@ddsjoberg, @bzkrouse and i think we should close this pr as there isnt a benefit to converting to bind_rows for tfrmt if we are going to keep the class, |
Up to you and @bzkrouse ! |


What changes are proposed in this pull request?
NEWS.md. (#, @)Update
ard_stackto usedplyr::bind_rowsinstead ofbind_ard, and removeard_stackclassProvide more detail here as needed.
Reference GitHub issue associated with pull request. e.g., 'closes #'
closes #586
Pre-review Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)
usethis::pr_merge_main()devtools::test_coverage()Reviewer Checklist (if item does not apply, mark is as complete)
pkgdown::build_site(). Check the R console for errors, and review the rendered website.devtools::test_coverage()When the branch is ready to be merged:
NEWS.mdwith the changes from this pull request under the heading "# cards (development version)". If there is an issue associated with the pull request, reference it in parentheses at the end update (seeNEWS.mdfor examples).Optional Reverse Dependency Checks:
Install
checkedwithpak::pak("Genentech/checked")orpak::pak("checked")