policy(pr-review): revert skip-to-close-on-sight; gate closures on diff evidence#6583
Conversation
…ff evidence The `skip` route was changed on 2026-07-24 to mean "close on sight" as part of a contributor ban. That ban was reversed: the trigger was `Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5` trailers, but `claude-haiku-4-5` was named in the accepted Standard row of the tier table live at the time, and the Frontier-only rule landed at 2026-07-24T02:03:45Z — after the newest affected PR was opened at 2026-07-23T22:09:07Z. The enforcement was retroactive. The close-on-sight text outlived the ban in this tracked skill, so a future sweep would have re-applied it to every `skip` login — including `dale053`, which was set for an unrelated reason and never carried that action. - `skip` returns to decline-to-review; it does not authorize closing. - Drop the "a prior approval is not evidence" paragraph. It was written to justify dequeuing two PRs this maintainer had approved at unchanged heads, and it generalizes into distrusting our own review record. - Add the low-effort close rule, scoped to any author and to diff-visible evidence only, with the requirement to re-verify that evidence firsthand rather than inheriting an earlier review's summary. - Add the policy-date rule: git log the policy doc and diff the version live at the PR's createdAt before enforcing against it. - Record that a Co-Authored-By trailer names the model for one commit, so trailers are read against the implementing commits; a mid-run fallback leaves sub-floor trailers on a compliant change.
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 11 seconds Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Comment |
The
skiproute was changed on 2026-07-24 to mean "close on sight" as partof a contributor ban. That ban was reversed: the trigger was
Co-Authored-By: Claude Haiku 4.5trailers, butclaude-haiku-4-5wasnamed in the accepted Standard row of the tier table live at the time, and
the Frontier-only rule landed at 2026-07-24T02:03:45Z — after the newest
affected PR was opened at 2026-07-23T22:09:07Z. The enforcement was
retroactive.
The close-on-sight text outlived the ban in this tracked skill, so a future
sweep would have re-applied it to every
skiplogin — includingdale053,which was set for an unrelated reason and never carried that action.
skipreturns to decline-to-review; it does not authorize closing.justify dequeuing two PRs this maintainer had approved at unchanged heads,
and it generalizes into distrusting our own review record.
evidence only, with the requirement to re-verify that evidence firsthand
rather than inheriting an earlier review's summary.
at the PR's createdAt before enforcing against it.
trailers are read against the implementing commits; a mid-run fallback
leaves sub-floor trailers on a compliant change.