i18n(ja): restore @[handle] author-link format in release notes - #23426
Conversation
|
Important Review skippedAuto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch. Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the ⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: You can disable this status message by setting the Use the checkbox below for a quick retry:
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
61f17ec to
446ef1e
Compare
The machine translation inserted a stray space into GitHub author-attribution
links, rendering them as `@ [handle](url)` ("@ handle") instead of the English
source form `@[handle](url)` ("@handle"). Remove the space in every `@ [handle]`
author link. Purely mechanical (`@ [` -> `@[`); author-link count preserved.
Excludes resources/doc-templates/. Full-width # and link placement out of scope.
446ef1e to
47dfaec
Compare
[LGTM Timeline notifier]Timeline:
|
What is changed, added or deleted? (Required)
The machine translation inserted a stray space into GitHub author-attribution links, rendering them as
@ [handle](url)(which displays as "@ handle") instead of the English-source form@[handle](url)("@handle"). The English source never uses the spaced form (0 occurrences;@[everywhere).This PR removes the space in every
@ [handle](https://github.com/...)author link. It is purely mechanical and verified to be exactly the@ [→@[transform (base + transform == result, 0 other changes).Scope: 3382 author links across 46 files (mostly
releases/*.md, plus a few non-release contributor lists).Out of scope (separate/earlier work):
#→ intentionally left as-is.@, concatenated handles) are not touched here.Note: this shares some
releases/*.mdlines with open PRs #23408 (execution-plan term) and #23409 (HTML entities); since the changes are on different tokens of the same lines, whichever merges first, the other is rebased cleanly.Which TiDB version(s) do your changes apply to? (Required)
What is the related PR or file link(s)?
Follow-up to #23423 (release-note scramble fix).
Do your changes match any of the following descriptions?