Skip to content

Reject loss feedback after a packet was acked - #450

Merged
mengelbart merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/reject-loss-after-ack
Sep 8, 2026
Merged

Reject loss feedback after a packet was acked#450
mengelbart merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
fix/reject-loss-after-ack

Conversation

@mengelbart

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov

codecov Bot commented Sep 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 81.38%. Comparing base (e397cd1) to head (9eb4f92).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #450      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   81.32%   81.38%   +0.05%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines        4649     4651       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits         3781     3785       +4     
+ Misses        689      688       -1     
+ Partials      179      178       -1     
Flag Coverage Δ
go 81.38% <100.00%> (+0.05%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mengelbart
mengelbart force-pushed the fix/reject-loss-after-ack branch from cdbf721 to 42115f7 Compare September 4, 2026 08:44
@mengelbart
mengelbart force-pushed the fix/reject-loss-after-ack branch from 42115f7 to 9eb4f92 Compare September 8, 2026 07:01
@mengelbart
mengelbart merged commit 87d1548 into main Sep 8, 2026
19 checks passed
@mengelbart
mengelbart deleted the fix/reject-loss-after-ack branch September 8, 2026 07:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants