Skip to content

Fix missed in v1.14.3 - #911

Merged
bouwew merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
select_schedule_2
Aug 2, 2026
Merged

Fix missed in v1.14.3#911
bouwew merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
select_schedule_2

Conversation

@bouwew

@bouwew bouwew commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Warning

Review limit reached

@bouwew, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 14 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: b2db1879-0fef-45fa-b211-6dc9e9367f88

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8b41c85 and ece9660.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • fixtures/m_adam_multiple_devices_per_zone/data.json
  • plugwise/__init__.py
  • plugwise/constants.py
  • plugwise/smilecomm.py
  • pyproject.toml
  • scripts/manual_fixtures.py
  • tests/test_init.py

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@bouwew
bouwew force-pushed the select_schedule_2 branch from d308889 to ece9660 Compare August 2, 2026 08:11
@sonarqubecloud

sonarqubecloud Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@bouwew
bouwew deployed to testpypi August 2, 2026 08:13 — with GitHub Actions Active
@codecov

codecov Bot commented Aug 2, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (8b41c85) to head (ece9660).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #911   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         3502      3502           
=========================================
  Hits          3502      3502           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Harness.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@bouwew
bouwew marked this pull request as ready for review August 2, 2026 08:16
@bouwew
bouwew requested a review from a team as a code owner August 2, 2026 08:16
@bouwew
bouwew merged commit 546ddb1 into main Aug 2, 2026
18 checks passed
@bouwew
bouwew deleted the select_schedule_2 branch August 2, 2026 10:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants