example F: update Web description

[DamianDuy]

Matching updated code in: pmemhackathon/hackathon#5

---

This change is 

[lukaszstolarczuk]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r1, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 3 unresolved discussions (waiting on @DamianDuy)

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 70 at r1 (raw file):

<p>
A simple C program using <b>libpmem2</b> is shown below. The correct machanism for flushing the data

machanism misspell

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 71 at r1 (raw file):

<p>
A simple C program using <b>libpmem2</b> is shown below. The correct machanism for flushing the data
into user storage is automatically chosen by <b>libpmem2</b>. To obtain the correct function for flushing

user storage -> (underlaying) medium (?)

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 74 at r1 (raw file):

from user space, <tt><a href="https://pmem.io/pmdk/manpages/linux/master/libpmem2/pmem2_get_persist_fn.3/" target="_new">pmem2_get_persist_fn()</a></tt>
is used.
<p>

perhaps we should describe here a little, when to call this function

[DamianDuy]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk)

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 70 at r1 (raw file):

Previously, lukaszstolarczuk (Łukasz Stolarczuk) wrote…

machanism misspell

Done.

[lukaszstolarczuk]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @DamianDuy)

[wlemkows]

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r2, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: complete! all files reviewed, all discussions resolved (waiting on @DamianDuy)

[wlemkows]

Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @DamianDuy)

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 74 at r2 (raw file):

from user space, <tt><a href="https://pmem.io/pmdk/manpages/linux/master/libpmem2/pmem2_get_persist_fn.3/" target="_new">pmem2_get_persist_fn()</a></tt>
is used. It returns a pointer to the function, which efficiently persists the data in the range owned by the map. As can be seen in the example below,
we call the obtained function with the provided <i>map</i> argument after our data was stored to the persistent memory (see line 93). The obtained function

I am not sure if those line numbers are correct (?)

[DamianDuy]

Reviewable status: 0 of 1 files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @lukaszstolarczuk and @wlemkows)

---

templates/examples/F/body.tmpl line 74 at r2 (raw file):

Previously, wlemkows (Weronika Lewandowska) wrote…

I am not sure if those line numbers are correct (?)

I referred to the line where data was stored into memory instead of the line where the described pmem2_get_persist_fn() function was actually called, which was confusing. I've changed it now.

[lukaszstolarczuk]

👍

Reviewed 1 of 1 files at r3, all commit messages.
Reviewable status: all files reviewed, 1 unresolved discussion (waiting on @wlemkows)