From the PowerSync perspective, is it better to use Supabase or Serverpod for the backend? #365
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
|
Hey @finnvyrn, PowerSync is framework agnostic and generally we dictate backend choices because they should all work well. When working on a fresh project or prototype I typically lean towards Supabase as most of the features I need (auth, file storage) are easy to enable, but that decision has very little to do with how it interfaces with PowerSync. Other things to keep in mind is how your choice allows for hosting and what pricing they require. |
1 reply
|
I see. Thank you! |
Answer selected by
Chriztiaan
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Hey @finnvyrn, PowerSync is framework agnostic and generally we dictate backend choices because they should all work well. When working on a fresh project or prototype I typically lean towards Supabase as most of the features I need (auth, file storage) are easy to enable, but that decision has very little to do with how it interfaces with PowerSync. Other things to keep in mind is how your choice allows for hosting and what pricing they require.