6.24?

[purdy]

It looks like 6.24 is already out and I was wondering if Pressflow is going to update to that soon or wait until more testing is completed? If you look at the release page:

http://drupal.org/drupal-7.12

It says about 6.24 that "these might need a bit more testing before deployment"

Thanks!

[gateway]

Yea I would like to know as well, im gonna at least update it for 6.23 for now but it seems with 6.24 a lot of nice things where fixed and some backported stuff from 7 that optimizes indexs for Drupal would be great to see in pressflow.

[ghmercado]

I have a serious problem where all my content is suddenly unavailable to anonymous viewers of my site. I checked the db and found a 'Found row where the auto_increment column has the value 0' issue, which was resolved by optimizing the database. I upgraded to pressflow 6.23 and am still getting a 'security upgrade required' message, so I'm thinking maybe this might be a solution to my problem (or at the very least update my site).

My problem is serious enough for me to have to revert back to Drupal 6.24 and forego varnish/pressflow. But before I do that I wanna give pressflow 6.24 a try first if it exists.

[javeez]

We've a website that have more than 300K visitors per day, and almost 1M hits daily. We can't afford going back to Drupal,
Please tell us when pressflow 6.24 will be existed.

Best

[davidstrauss]

@javeez I have to pull in, integrate, and test the (rather major) 6.24 bootstrap changes. 6.23, which includes all security fixes, has been available since the day of Drupal 6.23's release.

[ghmercado]

the issues I mentioned were resolved by a permissions rebuild. They just coincided with the security upgrade notice to 6.24 which made me wonder if it was related. I realize the security fixes are in 6.23, and the 'security upgrade required' message is annoying more than anything.

[davidstrauss]

@ghmercado Yep, I'm looking at pulling in the .info file changes or just dropping the version data from them entirely.

[davidstrauss]

It's out now.

[purdy]

Wow, thanks, @davidstrauss ... that looks great! That was not a simple merge ... thanks again!