fix(release): bump-minor regenerates the lockfile#145
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 48 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: ASSERTIVE Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
WalkthroughAdded a 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
✨ Simplify code
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
commit: |
2efdce4 to
faffb25
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@skills-contrib/publish-npm-version/SKILL.md`:
- Line 51: Insert a blank line immediately before the fenced bash command block
in the publish-npm-version documentation so the fence is separated from the
preceding paragraph and satisfies markdownlint MD031.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: Organization UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ccc223d1-ccfd-4e13-87ed-1642a6863a3f
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
docs/oss/versioning.mdpackage.jsonscripts/bump-minor.tsskills-contrib/publish-npm-version/SKILL.md
The v0.2.0 release PR (#143) went red across CI because the bump rewrote workspace:<version> pins in every manifest but left pnpm-lock.yaml at the old version, and CI installs with --frozen-lockfile. bump-minor now runs `pnpm install --lockfile-only` after set-version, the `pnpm bump-minor` script both docs already reference actually exists, and the skill/versioning docs call out the lockfile requirement. Signed-off-by: willbot <w.a.madden+machine@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Will Madden <madden@prisma.io> Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
faffb25 to
2d126f2
Compare
The v0.2.0 release PR (#143) failed every CI job at the install step: the bump rewrote the internal
workspace:<version>pins in all 32 manifests, butpnpm-lock.yamlstill recorded the old version, and CI installs with--frozen-lockfile.This makes the release tooling regenerate the lockfile itself so the procedure can't miss it again:
scripts/bump-minor.tsnow runspnpm install --lockfile-onlyafter stamping versions.pnpm bump-minorscript that bothdocs/oss/versioning.mdand thepublish-npm-versionskill already referenced but which didn't exist.pnpm-lock.yamland why.Verified by running
pnpm bump-minoron a clean checkout: the diff contains all 32 workspacepackage.jsonfiles pluspnpm-lock.yaml, andpnpm install --frozen-lockfilepasses afterwards.🤖 Generated with Claude Code