Skip to content

Move ThreatCrush CI workflow into .github/workflows/ - #3

Merged
ralyodio merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci-final
Aug 1, 2026
Merged

Move ThreatCrush CI workflow into .github/workflows/#3
ralyodio merged 1 commit into
masterfrom
ci-final

Conversation

@ralyodio

@ralyodio ralyodio commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Relocates the workflow staged at docs/threatcrush-scan.yml in #2 into .github/workflows/, where GitHub Actions actually reads it. No content change.

Completes PRD goal G2. First run is expected to FAIL: cli.threatcrush.com does not resolve, so the job writes an empty SARIF, reports that the scanner did not run, and exits non-zero rather than showing a green check that means nothing.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Relocates the workflow staged at docs/threatcrush-scan.yml in #2 to the path
GitHub Actions actually reads. No content change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
@ralyodio
ralyodio merged commit e44d9bb into master Aug 1, 2026
@ralyodio
ralyodio deleted the ci-final branch August 1, 2026 03:43
@github-advanced-security

Copy link
Copy Markdown

You are seeing this message because GitHub Code Scanning has recently been set up for this repository, or this pull request contains the workflow file for the Code Scanning tool.

What Enabling Code Scanning Means:

  • The 'Security' tab will display more code scanning analysis results (e.g., for the default branch).
  • Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results.
  • You will be able to see the analysis results for the pull request's branch on this overview once the scans have completed and the checks have passed.

For more information about GitHub Code Scanning, check out the documentation.

@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Aug 1, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

ThreatCrush scan results

0 finding(s) from threatcrush.

Severity Count
0

Detection coverage — FAIL

Metric Result
True positive rate 0.0% (0/77)
False positive rate 0.0% (0/39)
Missed detections 77

Every file under vulns/ contains intentional vulnerabilities used to
measure scanner accuracy. Findings there are the expected outcome, not a
regression. See docs/VULNERABILITY_CATALOG.md.

Posted by scripts/generate-report.py.

ralyodio added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2026
Staged outside .github/workflows/ because the pushing token lacked the
workflow OAuth scope. Moved into place in #3.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
ralyodio added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2026
Relocates the workflow staged in #2 to the path GitHub Actions reads.
No content change.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants