The hub's own .editorconfig comment contradicts CODESTYLE.md's whole-file carry model

[ptr727]

What happened

.editorconfig carries this comment above the .NET-only block, on current hub main:

# .NET-only below, covering C# and ReSharper style.
# Everything above is the line-ending governance every derived repo carries, and a non-.NET repo may drop from here down.

CODESTYLE.md "General" states the opposite -- that the whole file, including inert language-specific blocks, is kept rather than trimmed:

A repo keeps the whole file rather than trimming it. An unused-language section costs nothing, the same whole-file model as .editorconfig, whose inert [*.cs] block a non-.NET repo keeps.

So the two hub-canonical files disagree about the intended behavior for a non-.NET repo: one says "may drop", the other says "keeps... doesn't trim." This reads like leftover text from before #160 settled on the whole-file model -- the comment inside .editorconfig itself was never updated to match.

Where I hit it

Resyncing ptr727/HomeAutomation-Config (source-only, no .NET): I re-vendored .editorconfig to match the hub's current file byte-for-byte per the whole-file model CODESTYLE.md states (restoring the previously-trimmed .NET/ReSharper block). CodeRabbit flagged the contradiction against the very comment I was re-vendoring (PR #76, .editorconfig:44). Declined there as hub-owned verbatim content I can't fix locally without diverging from the hub's canonical file -- filing here instead.

Suggested fix

Reword the comment to state the file is kept whole regardless of language mix, e.g. "a non-.NET repo carries this section unused, per CODESTYLE.md's whole-file model" instead of "may drop from here down."

audit run 2026-08-25T13:46:24Z | hub fa63163