Add AWS re:Invent blog post

[adamgordonbell]

No description provided.

[claude]

Documentation Review

This is a well-written blog post that effectively explains AWS's integrated AI strategy announced at re:Invent 2025. The writing is clear, engaging, and follows the repository's style guidelines. Below are a few minor issues to address:

Issues Found

1. Possible trademark consistency (line 17, 22, 35, etc.)
Throughout the document, AWS product names like "Nova Forge," "Nova," "Bedrock," and "AgentCore" are sometimes hyperlinked and sometimes not. For consistency and to help readers navigate to AWS documentation, consider either:

• Always linking the first mention of each product, or
• Removing hyperlinks from inline mentions and instead adding a "Learn more" section at the end with all relevant AWS documentation links

2. Heading capitalization (line 24)

## Rent the lab: Nova Forge

Should follow sentence case per STYLE-GUIDE.md for H2 headings:

## Rent the lab: Nova Forge

Actually, this appears correct as-is since "Nova Forge" is a proper noun. No change needed.

3. Heading capitalization (line 36)

## The margin weapon: Trainium

This follows sentence case correctly with "Trainium" being a proper noun. No change needed.

4. Consider link text improvement (line 21)
The "Try it with Neo" links use very descriptive prompts embedded in the URL, which is good. However, the link text could be slightly more specific:

Current: "Set up Nova 2 with Pulumi"
Consider: "Set up AWS Bedrock permissions and call Nova 2 Pro"

This is a minor suggestion and not a requirement.

5. All headings follow proper capitalization
After reviewing all headings, they correctly follow sentence case for H2+ with proper nouns capitalized appropriately.

Strengths

• Excellent narrative structure: The post builds a cohesive argument about AWS's integrated AI stack rather than just listing announcements
• Strong hook: The opening about AWS not publishing benchmarks effectively sets up the main thesis
• Good use of figures: Inline images with captions effectively illustrate complex concepts
• Proper source citations: Footnotes provide credibility and allow readers to verify claims
• Clear call-to-action: "Try it with Neo" links are well-placed and actionable
• Appropriate tone: Technical but accessible, avoiding excessive hype while remaining engaging
• Concise paragraphs: Most paragraphs stay within the 3-4 sentence guideline

Technical Accuracy

The technical content appears accurate based on AWS's re:Invent 2025 announcements. The connections between Nova Forge, Trainium, AgentCore, and Nova Act are well-explained and the cost/benefit analysis is reasonable.

---

This review was performed by an AI assistant. If you'd like additional reviews or fixes, please mention @claude in the PR.

[pulumi-bot]

Your site preview for commit c37b71f is ready! 🎉

http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16783-c37b71fd.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com.

[pulumi-bot]

Your site preview for commit bc111b6 is ready! 🎉

http://www-testing-pulumi-docs-origin-pr-16783-bc111b6c.s3-website.us-west-2.amazonaws.com.