Skip to content

Fix test for _fit_sandia_cocontent #2615

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
kandersolar merged 4 commits into from
Dec 9, 2025
Merged

Fix test for _fit_sandia_cocontent #2615

Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
4 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
fdbaec3
correct argument and value order
cwhanse Dec 8, 2025
40d141c
whatsnew
cwhanse Dec 8, 2025
06d8abb
move note to Testing section
cwhanse Dec 8, 2025
6642d62
Update docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew/v0.13.2.rst
cwhanse Dec 8, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
3 changes: 2 additions & 1 deletion docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew/v0.13.2.rst
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -18,7 +18,6 @@ Deprecations
Bug fixes
~~~~~~~~~


Enhancements
~~~~~~~~~~~~
* Add :py:func:`~pvlib.ivtools.sdm.fit_desoto_batzelis`, a function to estimate
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -56,6 +55,8 @@ Testing
* Add Python 3.14 to test suite. (:pull:`2590`)
* Update pytest configuration in ``pyproject.toml`` to work with pytest 9.0.
(:pull:`2596`)
* Correct argument and value order in :py:func:`~pvlib.tests.ivtools.test_sde`,
in tests of :py:func:`~pvlib.ivtools.sde._fit_sandia_cocontent`. (:issue:`2613`, :pull:`2615`)


Benchmarking
Expand Down
6 changes: 3 additions & 3 deletions tests/ivtools/test_sde.py
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -57,18 +57,18 @@ def test_fit_sandia_simple_bad_iv(get_bad_iv_curves):
(np.array([3., 2.9, 2.8, 2.7, 2.6, 2.5, 2.4, 1.7, 0.8, 0.]),
np.array([0., 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1., 1.2, 1.4, 1.45, 1.5]),
10.,
(2.3392, 11.6865, -.232, -.2596, -.7119)),
(2.3392, 11.6865, -.2596, -.232, -.7119)),
(np.array(
[5., 4.9, 4.8, 4.7, 4.6, 4.5, 4.4, 4.3, 4.2, 4.1, 4., 3.8, 3.5, 1.7,
0.]),
np.array(
[0., .1, .2, .3, .4, .5, .6, .7, .8, .9, 1., 1.1, 1.18, 1.2, 1.22]),
15.,
(-22.0795, 27.1196, -4.2076, -.0056, -.0498))])
(-22.0795, 27.1196, -.0056, -4.2076, -.0498))])
def test__fit_sandia_cocontent(i, v, nsvth, expected):
# test confirms agreement with Matlab code. The returned parameters
# are nonsense
iph, io, rsh, rs, n = sde._fit_sandia_cocontent(v, i, nsvth)
iph, io, rs, rsh, n = sde._fit_sandia_cocontent(v, i, nsvth)
np.testing.assert_allclose(iph, np.array(expected[0]), atol=.0001)
np.testing.assert_allclose(io, np.array([expected[1]]), atol=.0001)
np.testing.assert_allclose(rs, np.array([expected[2]]), atol=.0001)
Expand Down