Skip to content

Set 'notebooks' as working directory for execution and adjust paths#54

Merged
mbruns91 merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
ci/update-actions
May 18, 2026
Merged

Set 'notebooks' as working directory for execution and adjust paths#54
mbruns91 merged 6 commits into
mainfrom
ci/update-actions

Conversation

@mbruns91
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR is supposed to validate the new notebook-cwd feature introduced in pyiron/actions via this PR.

With a successful validation, this PR will also directly integrate the usage of the new feature.

The advantage afterwards is that a user cloning this repo, running jupyter and opening a notebook from notebooks can right away execute notebooks end-to-end, even if files are referenced (like, e.g. in OntodockClient.ipynb) while also letting the CI execute them successfully. Before, there was a mismatch: CI runners had the repo root as working directory for notebook execution, a local user will typically have notebooks/ as the kernels working directory.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Binder 👈 Launch a binder notebook on branch pyiron/courier/ci/update-actions

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented May 12, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (2b22545) to head (0e547c0).
⚠️ Report is 22 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main       #54   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           26        26           
  Lines          964       984   +20     
=========================================
+ Hits           964       984   +20     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@mbruns91
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

mbruns91 commented May 12, 2026

The failing test is because the branch actions-4.2.0 was not yet tagging actions-4.2.0.

@mbruns91
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

There was a conflicting dataset from the failed run on the used ontodocker instance which caused the notebook execution to fail.

@mbruns91 mbruns91 merged commit b98ee00 into main May 18, 2026
20 checks passed
@mbruns91 mbruns91 deleted the ci/update-actions branch May 19, 2026 11:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant