Conversation
thusser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
…le follow-ups Splits the plan's "representative slew/rotate distance" non-goal into three cases by difficulty: OnDemandScheduler's first placed task (solvable now via a pre-fetched live telescope position, pyobs-core#858), every subsequent task in the same scheduling pass (needs new scheduler state, pyobs-core#859), and the portal script-builder's live-edit estimate (no schedule context at all). Also updates the plan's design (§A.1/§A.8) for the flat per-device capability lookup pyobs-portal#139 will produce, replacing the two-step "resolve Instrument, then search its nested camera list" indirection that had no key to match CameraCapability against (only a physical code, not a module name). Marks the plan blocked on #139. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011KFgSu7kCF57mnioSHM2km
thusser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011KFgSu7kCF57mnioSHM2km
thusser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
pyobs-portal#140 (closes #139) merged to develop 2026-09-02, moving module_name onto Telescope/Dome/CameraCapability as the plan's design already assumed. Removes the landed #139 row from fleet-open-items.md per its own maintenance rule. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_011KFgSu7kCF57mnioSHM2km
thusser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
…le follow-ups Splits the plan's "representative slew/rotate distance" non-goal into three cases by difficulty: OnDemandScheduler's first placed task (solvable now via a pre-fetched live telescope position, pyobs-core#858), every subsequent task in the same scheduling pass (needs new scheduler state, pyobs-core#859), and the portal script-builder's live-edit estimate (no schedule context at all). Also updates the plan's design (§A.1/§A.8) for the flat per-device capability lookup pyobs-portal#139 will produce, replacing the two-step "resolve Instrument, then search its nested camera list" indirection that had no key to match CameraCapability against (only a physical code, not a module name). Marks the plan blocked on #139. Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
thusser
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 2, 2026
Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This was referenced Sep 2, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
version 0.18.19