Skip to content

Conversation

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member

@nicoddemus nicoddemus commented Jul 14, 2016

Still a work in progress, I plan to publish only after pytest-3.0 is effectively out.

Meanwhile, suggestions on writing style, order of the sessions, anything really, is welcome!

cc @hackebrot

@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member

You seem to use double backticks in various places, which is ReST and not markdown 😉

def add_np(doctest_namespace):
doctest_namespace['np'] = numpy

Doctests in the same below the `conftest.py` file can now use the `numpy` module directly:
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

"in the same below the conftest.py file"?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fixed, thanks

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member Author

You seem to use double backticks in various places, which is ReST and not markdown

Yep, thanks! 😖

@nicoddemus nicoddemus changed the title WIP: First version of the "what's new in pytest 3.0" post What's new in pytest 3.0 Aug 16, 2016
@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member Author

It seems like it should be ready to be posted.

Does anybody mind if I merge this myself after publishing the package?

@The-Compiler
Copy link
Member

Not sure how up-to-date it is, though:

  • seems like the resultlog deprecation isn't in it (but that was just merged 😆)
  • if we talk about deprecated features, should we also talk about removed commandline options?
  • anything else?

@nicoddemus nicoddemus merged commit 6bd32f5 into pytest-dev:master Aug 19, 2016
@nicoddemus nicoddemus deleted the whats-new-30 branch August 19, 2016 20:24
@hackebrot
Copy link
Member

@nicoddemus 🍰

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member Author

Hmm for some reason it did not appear yet on blog.pytest.org... 😕

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member Author

@pfctdayelise @pelme blog.pytest.org still doesn't show the new post. The build appears to have been successful, any ideas?

@nicoddemus
Copy link
Member Author

Nevermind, the post was marked as a draft. Published and online now. 😁

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants