CI Job Merge#255
Merged
Merged
Conversation
* Rename some tasks * Simplify python commands by removing python3 -m * Break up some long lines
5ea688c to
a2a65e7
Compare
* Show missing line numbers in report
* Remove --branch option since it's already specified in .coveragerc
7318e1d to
6838967
Compare
be0d1bb to
fa67b3e
Compare
scragly
approved these changes
Sep 21, 2019
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The lint and test jobs have been merged. This improves build times by cutting out an extraneous Python environment setup with pipenv. While looking at the published lint results in Azure isn't particularly useful due to the poor format, one thing to note about this is that the lint and test results are now published with one task which means they will be named similarly. It doesn't have to be that way though.
Another notable feature added was publishing coverage results. The interface is quite nice as it also lets you see code highlighted based on coverage. However, it adds 13 seconds to the build time.