Run Pyrefly on typeshed stubs in CI - #16155
Merged
Merged
Conversation
Contributor
|
According to mypy_primer, this change has no effect on the checked open source code. 🤖🎉 |
yangdanny97
marked this pull request as ready for review
August 7, 2026 03:16
JelleZijlstra
approved these changes
Aug 7, 2026
JelleZijlstra
left a comment
JelleZijlstra
left a comment
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks! I feel the places where pyrefly raises an error but other type checkers don't indicate two bugs in pyrefly; are you tracking those?
Member
|
Sorry I should have read the PR description, you already mentioned it! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
fixes #16000
There are ~30 unknown-name errors caused by 2 known issues
facebook/pyrefly#4410
facebook/pyrefly#4411
Those should be fixed by the full 1.3.0 release