Skip to content

[Sync to prerelease] new custom attribute for algolia search #1544

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
cwickham merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025
Merged

[Sync to prerelease] new custom attribute for algolia search #1544

cwickham merged 1 commit into from
Jan 17, 2025

Conversation

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions github-actions bot commented Jan 17, 2025

Description

Sync of #1541 to prerelease.

Original PR

new custom attribute for algolia search

We're experimenting with fixing our algolia search here.

@cscheid @cwickham @github-actions
Add weight attribute to promote Guide in algolia search (#1541)
68b6089 
* new custom attribute for algolia search

* Use test index temporarily

* Back to `prod` index

---------

Co-authored-by: Charlotte Wickham <cwickham@gmail.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9dd0c5f)
@cderv
Copy link
Collaborator

cderv commented Jan 17, 2025

/deploy-preview

@github-actions github-actions bot mentioned this pull request Jan 17, 2025
Merged
@cwickham cwickham marked this pull request as draft January 17, 2025 18:12
@cwickham
Copy link
Collaborator

cwickham commented Jan 17, 2025

Let's not merge until I've confirmed this change is OK on main

@cwickham cwickham marked this pull request as ready for review January 17, 2025 18:15
@cwickham cwickham merged commit eda60a5 into prerelease Jan 17, 2025
@cwickham cwickham deleted the sync-1541-to-prerelease branch January 17, 2025 18:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Reviewers

No reviews

Assignees

No one assigned

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Milestone

No milestone

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants

@cderv @cwickham @cscheid