Skip to content

Conversation

@SimonUnge
Copy link
Collaborator

… is over all vhost in the cluster WITH test update this time!

Proposed Changes

Please describe the big picture of your changes here to communicate to the RabbitMQ team why we should accept this pull request.
If it fixes a bug or resolves a feature request, be sure to link to that issue.

A pull request that doesn't explain why the change was made has a much lower chance of being accepted.

Types of Changes

What types of changes does your code introduce to this project?
Put an x in the boxes that apply

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes issue #NNNN)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause an observable behavior change in existing systems)
  • Documentation improvements (corrections, new content, etc)
  • Cosmetic change (whitespace, formatting, etc)
  • Build system and/or CI

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply.
You can also fill these out after creating the PR.
If you're unsure about any of them, don't hesitate to ask on the mailing list.
We're here to help!
This is simply a reminder of what we are going to look for before merging your code.

  • I have read the CONTRIBUTING.md document
  • I have signed the CA (see https://cla.pivotal.io/sign/rabbitmq)
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • All tests pass locally with my changes
  • If relevant, I have added necessary documentation to https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-website
  • If relevant, I have added this change to the first version(s) in release-notes that I expect to introduce it

Further Comments

If this is a relatively large or complex change, kick off the discussion by explaining why you chose the solution
you did and what alternatives you considered, etc.

@SimonUnge SimonUnge marked this pull request as ready for review January 24, 2025 23:57
@michaelklishin michaelklishin added this to the 4.1.0 milestone Jan 25, 2025
@michaelklishin michaelklishin merged commit a53f051 into main Jan 25, 2025
272 checks passed
@michaelklishin michaelklishin deleted the su_aws/limit_logging_error_with_tests branch January 25, 2025 01:39
michaelklishin added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2025
Log incorrectly claims the limit is per node, but the component count… (backport #13154)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants