Skip to content

docs: clarify serviceInstanceDeployV2 default behavior and document c…#1163

Merged
rahulparmar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify-deploy-vs-redeploy
May 16, 2026
Merged

docs: clarify serviceInstanceDeployV2 default behavior and document c…#1163
rahulparmar merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs/clarify-deploy-vs-redeploy

Conversation

@rahulparmar
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Clarifies that serviceInstanceDeployV2 without commitSha deploys the service's currently associated commit (same as
serviceInstanceRedeploy), and documents the commitSha parameter for deploying a specific commit (e.g. the latest HEAD of a
connected GitHub branch).

Prompted by customer feedback on a Slack Connect thread where the prior wording ("Trigger a new deployment" vs "Redeploy the
latest deployment") implied a behavioral difference that doesn't exist by default.

@railway-app
Copy link
Copy Markdown

railway-app Bot commented May 15, 2026

🚅 Deployed to the docs-pr-1163 environment in 🪄 *.railway.com

Service Status Web Updated (UTC)
Docs Frontend ❌ Build Failed (View Logs) Web May 15, 2026 at 7:59 pm
7 services not affected by this PR
  • devicons
  • OG
  • Geofeed
  • Frontend Redis
  • Blog
  • Turnout
  • Meilisearch

@railway-app railway-app Bot temporarily deployed to *.railway.com / docs-pr-1163 May 15, 2026 19:57 Destroyed
@rahulparmar rahulparmar merged commit 74ce438 into main May 16, 2026
5 of 7 checks passed
@rahulparmar rahulparmar deleted the docs/clarify-deploy-vs-redeploy branch May 16, 2026 15:28
MykalMachon added a commit that referenced this pull request May 18, 2026
The commitSha example introduced in #1163 used <CodeTabs> instead of
<GraphQLCodeTabs>, causing the static prerender to fail with
"Expected component CodeTabs to be defined" and breaking main.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant