Mike Sync v2 review - #92
Merged
Merged
Conversation
This was referenced Aug 7, 2026
Author
|
Baseline failed for exact head
Bounded automatic repair runs only for eligible low-risk paths. Protected workflow, dependency, migration, deployment, security, legal, governance, or release changes require focused review. |
ranade-oss
force-pushed
the
agent/upstream-sync-31201214774
branch
from
August 7, 2026 23:21
a0ff891 to
9d25a15
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Automated-Upstream-Mike-Sync: true
Upstream-Risk: low
Summary
Reviewed all five PRs in bundle order. One low-risk ROSS-native accessibility adaptation is implementation-eligible; the working tree was not modified.
Capability classifications
Supabase stack security CI— Useful security validation, but it changes CI infrastructure and exercises RLS, schemas, and migrations; those boundaries require human approval.Accessible control names— ROSS has the same three unlabeled controls. Adopt only presentation-neutral aria-labels; exclude the new dependency, lockfile, nightly CI, and Mike-specific E2E documentation.Frontend wrapper coverage ratchet— The tests may be useful, but ROSS has no frontend Vitest configuration and its API wrappers materially diverge from Mike’s routes and provider assumptions.Microsoft Word add-in— This is a large new client surface involving authentication, document data, public APIs, dependencies, and deployment; its patch was also omitted by the observation bound.Word add-in semver declaration— ROSS has no Word add-in, and dependency or lockfile changes are ineligible; reconsider only if [Feature 14] feat: Word add-in — chat, tracked-changes rewrites, workflows and projects in Word Open-Legal-Products/mike#221 is separately approved and implemented.Safety
Mike Sync v2 applies at most one low-risk implementation candidate per branch. Exact-head Baseline, bounded repair, review, mergeability, and release controls remain authoritative.