-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7k
DepSets CLI tool #53785
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
DepSets CLI tool #53785
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
## Why are these changes needed? Make `x-request-id` a constant. Signed-off-by: Cindy Zhang <cindyzyx9@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…#53577) ```cpp task_spec.TaskId().Binary() ``` * `TaskId()` deserializes binary to TaskId. * `Binary()` serializes `TaskId` to binary. This PR: * renames `TaskId` to `GetTaskId` * adds `GetTaskIdBinary` --------- Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…53656) This is purely refactoring with no new logic: - Rename `GrpcStubManager` to `GrpcClientManager` - Turn `GrpcClientManager` into an abstract class with an implementation --------- Signed-off-by: irabbani <irabbani@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
`test_runtime_env_*` large -> medium Move a few others. --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Fix map_batches release test back_to_back option plumbing to release tests. --------- Signed-off-by: Srinath Krishnamachari <srinath.krishnamachari@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
allowing people to check in byod scripts Signed-off-by: Lonnie Liu <lonnie@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
we upgraded the machine and releases Signed-off-by: Lonnie Liu <lonnie@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Saw this flake on [postmerge](https://buildkite.com/ray-project/postmerge/builds/10702#01975572-3a26-4e0b-b27d-0869ac5830fe/177-1191). Cleaned up the test in general: - Remove sleep conditions. - Remove use of direct gRPC connection to raylet. - Remove runtime_env test that was redundant with `test_runtime_env_env_vars.py`. Runtime decreased by ~50% locally, from `62.98s` to `33.48s`. --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
These have been deprecated/ignored for a long time and are polluting the help string. --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
… Data (#53220) --------- Signed-off-by: Timothy Seah <tseah@anyscale.com> Co-authored-by: angelinalg <122562471+angelinalg@users.noreply.github.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
the option is only used for `manylinux1`. ray is not using manylinux1 to build things any more. --------- Signed-off-by: Gagandeep Singh <gdp.1807@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Adding back "Run on Anyscale" button after a Anyscale PR was merged to show the button on Ray docs but not Anyscale template previews Signed-off-by: Chris Zhang <chris@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiajun Yao <jeromeyjj@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…fig (#53681) The schema of compute config that Kuberay service takes in is currently a bit different from the schema of cluster compute in release tests. This is a helper function built to convert the cluster compute into Kuberay compute config that eventually gets sent into Kuberay service --------- Signed-off-by: kevin <kevin@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: abrar <abrar@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
don't know for sure, but seems like a race condition between when the cancel happens and attempt to access the ray task result causes `RayTaskCancelled` exception. Used the repro script in the ticket to confirm that the issue is resolved #53639. --------- Signed-off-by: abrar <abrar@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
- Add prefix `rayproject/ray` for all tags - Authorize docker with credentials from SSM - Mock authorize docker in unit test since it's not needed --------- Signed-off-by: kevin <kevin@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
I made the workload more stressful in #53803 by fetching all of the results concurrently. That seems to have caused Windows to time out: https://buildkite.com/ray-project/postmerge/builds/10876#01977755-755b-485e-bd13-f0ea3e33cc36/158-818 I won't pretend to fully understand why, but reverting to the old pattern in an attempt to fix it. Also added an explicit wait for the dir to drain because there was an error during cleanup caused by it. --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Deflakes the test by ensuring that results come in out of order for the `imap_unordered` tests instead of relying on random `time.sleep`s. In the process of rewriting the tests, I discovered a bug in the implementation. We weren't re-fetching available object refs from the queue once we had gotten at least one, which caused the tests to hang. Added a timeout to the `ray.wait` call so we continually check for new object refs to add to the batch. --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
) ## Why are these changes needed? In `CoreWorker::Exit()`, the code calls: https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/c54437c42fa138580a0367f813b8c4bd9ca0b3e8/src/ray/core_worker/core_worker.cc#L1169 This tells the raylet to immediately release all resources that were allocated to this worker. However, the worker may still have tasks running at this point in the exit sequence. I have added a test to reproduce the issue. However, the test is reproducible 2 out of 5 times locally. In the test: 0. Ray init with only 1 CPU. 1. Start task1 and wait for it to signal it's running 2. Submit task2 (should be queued) 3. Try to wait for task2 to start with 1-second timeout: - No timeout: Bug! Task2 started immediately --> cleanup and fail - Timeout occurs: Correct! Task2 is queued --> continue 4. Complete task1 and assert expected result 5. Wait for task2 to start (should happen immediately now) 6. Complete task2 and assert expected result With the fix, the test always passes (no oversubscription detected) --------- Signed-off-by: Sagar Sumit <sagarsumit09@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? The example still uses Ray 2.0. It is pretty old and KubeRay has already had other similar examples. Remove it from the doc. ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [ ] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [ ] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [ ] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
If we pass GPU object refs within the same actor, NCCL send/recv will block indefinitely and the transfer is also unnecessary. This PR allows intra-process communication to retrieve tensors directly from the in-process actor store. Example: ``` small_tensor = torch.randn((1,)) # Intra-actor communication for pure GPU tensors ref = actor.echo.remote(small_tensor) result = actor.double.remote(ref) assert ray.get(result) == pytest.approx(small_tensor * 2) ``` ## Related issue number Closes #51685 Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…S FT guide (#53832) Signed-off-by: Rueian <rueiancsie@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Seiji Eicher <seiji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Release tests seem to be failing because of a merge conflict on master after #53390 was merged where a param is missing Signed-off-by: kevin <kevin@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
The example still uses Ray 2.2. It is pretty old and KubeRay has already had other similar examples (ex: https://docs.ray.io/en/latest/cluster/kubernetes/examples/mnist-training-example.html#kuberay-mnist-training-example). Remove it from the doc. Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: abrar <abrar@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…ead (#53844) https://docs.ray.io/en/master/cluster/kubernetes/examples/rayserve-llm-example.html#kuberay-rayservice-llm-example Currently, users can use Ray Serve LLM to run LLM serving workloads. Remove the old vLLM / RayService example guide. Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…efill disagg (#53821) Signed-off-by: kouroshhakha <kourosh@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? <!-- Please give a short summary of the change and the problem this solves. --> `read_text` currently treats a trailing newline as an empty line, which can lead to unexpected results. This isn’t consistent with how standard Python methods like `str.splitlines()` behave. Since trailing newlines are common in text files, this PR updates the behavior to ignore them. ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [ ] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [ ] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [ ] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? It is not safe to use the current process' cmdline to determine the "uv run" commandline args, since e.g. multiprocessing spawn will garble the commandline, so our current way of detecting the "uv run" commandline won't work if the process that runs `ray.init` was created with multiprocessing spawn like it is the case in some vllm settings. Also the command line might have been modified by setproctitle. This PR changes the extraction of the `uv run` command line to a more robust way that doesn't involve any state in the current process, only the uv command line of the uv shim process, and also adds a regression test. It also makes it possible to run `uv run -m <module>` and adds a regression test for that as well. ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [ ] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [ ] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [ ] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Co-authored-by: pcmoritz <pcmoritz@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? <!-- Please give a short summary of the change and the problem this solves. --> This change standardizes null handling across internal block formats by converting pd.NA to None. Since different formats (e.g., Pandas and Arrow) use different null representations, this ensures consistent semantics when converting between them. In particular, we treat pd.NA as a null value, while preserving np.nan as a distinct floating-point NaN. ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [ ] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [ ] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [ ] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…GPU objects (#53720) Adds integration between the single-controller collective APIs introduced in #53319 and the GPU objects feature prototyped in #52938. Actor collectives created through `ray.experimental.collective.create_collective_group` will now be automatically used if a task declares a tensor transport other than the default OBJECT_STORE. This also adds support for allocating the torch tensors on the correct device (GPU for NCCL and CPU for GLOO). See updates in test_gpu_objects.py for examples. --------- Signed-off-by: Stephanie wang <smwang@cs.washington.edu> Signed-off-by: Stephanie Wang <smwang@cs.washington.edu> Co-authored-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@apache.org> Co-authored-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…l instead (#53822) Signed-off-by: Timothy Seah <tseah@anyscale.com> Co-authored-by: Timothy Seah <tseah@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
…er process (#53815) Signed-off-by: Seiji Eicher <seiji@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? <!-- Please give a short summary of the change and the problem this solves. --> If a map transform function produces outputs with different column (e.g., you're reading a JSONL file where lines contain different keys), then Ray Data errors. This PR updates the implementation to make it more robust to variation in column names. ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [ ] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [ ] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [ ] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Balaji Veeramani <bveeramani@berkeley.edu> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
….values`. (#53514) Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
#53871 * CI error:  Closes #53871 Signed-off-by: Kai-Hsun Chen <kaihsun@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: Rui Qiao <ruisearch42@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
These are no longer flaky 🙌 --------- Signed-off-by: Edward Oakes <ed.nmi.oakes@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
The test_all_to_all.py is taking a really long time to finish ([35 minutes](https://buildkite.com/ray-project/postmerge/builds/10883/steps/canvas?jid=0197797e-9c25-4030-a1a6-ff89dba44f8e#0197797e-9c25-4030-a1a6-ff89dba44f8e/176-1023)). I'm breaking this into smaller chunks so they run in parallel. Test: CI Signed-off-by: can <can@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
<!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? Deprecate `use_polars` flag in favor of `use_polars_sort` ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [x] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [x] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [x] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
… for data workloads (#53857) <!-- Thank you for your contribution! Please review https://github.com/ray-project/ray/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.rst before opening a pull request. --> <!-- Please add a reviewer to the assignee section when you create a PR. If you don't have the access to it, we will shortly find a reviewer and assign them to your PR. --> ## Why are these changes needed? Logs a warning if the object store is given less < 50% memory for Data Workloads to minimize disk spilling ## Related issue number <!-- For example: "Closes #1234" --> ## Checks - [x] I've signed off every commit(by using the -s flag, i.e., `git commit -s`) in this PR. - [x] I've run `scripts/format.sh` to lint the changes in this PR. - [ ] I've included any doc changes needed for https://docs.ray.io/en/master/. - [ ] I've added any new APIs to the API Reference. For example, if I added a method in Tune, I've added it in `doc/source/tune/api/` under the corresponding `.rst` file. - [x] I've made sure the tests are passing. Note that there might be a few flaky tests, see the recent failures at https://flakey-tests.ray.io/ - Testing Strategy - [ ] Unit tests - [ ] Release tests - [ ] This PR is not tested :( --------- Signed-off-by: Goutam V <goutam@anyscale.com> Signed-off-by: elliot-barn <elliot.barnwell@anyscale.com>
9f9150a to
1a674ac
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why are these changes needed?
Related issue number
Checks
git commit -s) in this PR.scripts/format.shto lint the changes in this PR.method in Tune, I've added it in
doc/source/tune/api/under thecorresponding
.rstfile.