Hi!
The tutorial has an example like this:
class Square extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<button
className="square"
onClick={() => this.props.onClick()}
>
{this.props.value}
</button>
);
}
}
This component used in the Board component like this:
renderSquare(i) {
return (
<Square
value={this.state.squares[i]}
onClick={() => this.handleClick(i)}
/>
);
}
We have closed the context in a function that we pass to onClick in the Board component.
But why don't we just pass this.props.onClick to onClick in the Square component? Why are we using closures here if we already have the right context inside?
I wrote like this: (link to codepen)
class Square extends React.Component {
render() {
return (
<button
className="square"
onClick={this.props.onClick}
>
{this.props.value}
</button>
);
}
}
This works successfully
It is clear that the variant from the tutorial will also work. But further it says:
When we modified the Square to be a function component, we also changed onClick={() => this.props.onClick()} to a shorter onClick={props.onClick} (note the lack of parentheses on both sides).
So my variation only works in a functional component? But above it also worked in class components. I think this might confuse some people.
Hi!
The tutorial has an example like this:
This component used in the Board component like this:
We have closed the context in a function that we pass to onClick in the Board component.
But why don't we just pass this.props.onClick to onClick in the Square component? Why are we using closures here if we already have the right context inside?
I wrote like this: (link to codepen)
This works successfully
It is clear that the variant from the tutorial will also work. But further it says:
So my variation only works in a functional component? But above it also worked in class components. I think this might confuse some people.